Moore Jaime, Greenberg Caprice, Thibeault Susan L
Department of Surgery and Communication Sciences and Disorders, 5107 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2275.
Department of Surgery and School of Medicine and Public Health, 7375 Clinical Science Center, K6/148, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53792.
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
To evaluate predictors of longitudinal change in patient-perceived voice impact as determined by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
Prospective, survey study.
Patients consented to the University of Wisconsin Voice and Swallow Clinics Outcomes Database with voice, concerns with a baseline clinic visit from November 2012 to January 2014 were eligible for the study. The VHI was sent to patients 6 months post clinic visit to determine change in voice handicap from baseline. General health was screened using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, using physical component summary and mental component summary scores. Predictor variables included treatment (medical and/or behavioral); dysphonia sub-diagnosis; grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain rating; age; sex; socioeconomic factors; smoking history; and comorbidity score.
Two hundred thirty-seven patients met study criteria and were followed longitudinally. Eighty-two patients returned 6-month surveys. The VHI was significantly correlated with mental component summary scores. Patients with a higher grade in baseline grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain score were more likely to receive voice intervention (P = 0.04). Six-month improvement in VHI score was associated with both higher initial VHI score and higher educational level in both univariate (P < 0.01, P = 0.04) and multivariate analyses (P < 0.01, P = 0.02). Voice treatment (medical and/or behavioral) was not a significant factor for improvement in VHI score.
Our results suggest that it is important to consider baseline self-perceived voice impact measures and educational level in setting expectations for voice treatment. Future studies examining the relationship between treatment patterns and voice-related patient outcomes are warranted.
评估由嗓音障碍指数(VHI)所确定的患者自我感知嗓音影响的纵向变化预测因素。
前瞻性调查研究。
同意加入威斯康星大学嗓音与吞咽诊所结局数据库的患者,在2012年11月至2014年1月期间进行基线门诊就诊且有嗓音问题者符合本研究条件。在门诊就诊6个月后向患者发送VHI,以确定嗓音障碍相对于基线的变化。使用12项简短健康调查问卷对总体健康状况进行筛查,采用身体成分汇总得分和精神成分汇总得分。预测变量包括治疗(药物和/或行为治疗);发音障碍亚诊断;分级、粗糙感、气息声、无力感和紧张度评分;年龄;性别;社会经济因素;吸烟史;以及合并症评分。
237例患者符合研究标准并接受纵向随访。82例患者返回了6个月时的调查问卷。VHI与精神成分汇总得分显著相关。基线分级、粗糙感、气息声、无力感和紧张度评分较高的患者更有可能接受嗓音干预(P = 0.04)。在单因素分析(P < 0.01,P = 0.04)和多因素分析(P < 0.01,P = 0.02)中均发现,VHI评分在6个月时的改善与初始VHI评分较高以及教育水平较高有关。嗓音治疗(药物和/或行为治疗)并非VHI评分改善的显著因素。
我们的结果表明,在设定嗓音治疗预期时,考虑基线自我感知嗓音影响指标和教育水平很重要。有必要开展进一步研究以探讨治疗模式与嗓音相关患者结局之间的关系。