Knaus Stephen J, Saum Lindsay, Cochard Emily, Prichard Wesley, Skinner Brian, Medas Ryan
From St Vincent Hospital & Health Services, Indianapolis, Indiana, and Butler University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Indianapolis, Indiana.
South Med J. 2016 Mar;109(3):144-50. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000428.
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the United States. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of CDI were updated in 2010 by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. An institutional guideline for the classification and management of CDI in accordance with the 2010 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline was developed and provided to attending physicians and medical residents in multiple formats.
We sought to determine the impact of an evidence-based guideline for the treatment of CDI at a community teaching hospital. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, direct cost, mortality, and physician adherence to guidelines in patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes and laboratory confirmation of CDI between February 1, 2013 and January 31, 2014. Endpoints included LOS after diagnosis of CDI, 30-day readmission rates, direct cost after diagnosis of CDI, and mortality.
A total of 351 patient encounters were included in the study. Although not statistically significant, it was found that guideline-based therapy (n = 131) was associated with a lower median LOS (6 days vs 8 days; P = 0.06). Thirty-day hospital readmission (25.2% vs 29.5%; P = 0.39) and median cost after diagnosis of CDI ($7238.48 vs $8794.81; P = 0.10) also were lower but not statistically significant. Patients with mild-to-moderate infection were found to have a significantly lower median LOS (5 days vs 7 days; P = 0.03) and median cost after diagnosis ($5257.85 vs $7680.56; P = 0.03) when treated with guideline-based therapy. Overall physician adherence to guidelines was low, at 38%.
Treatment with guideline-based therapy for CDI was associated with a trend toward a significantly lower LOS and cost. Barriers to physician adherence to guidelines still exist, despite education and guideline availability. Electronic health record-based order sets or clinical decision tools may improve recognition of and adherence to guidelines.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是美国最常见的医疗保健相关感染。美国医疗保健流行病学学会和美国传染病学会于2010年更新了CDI治疗的临床实践指南。根据2010年美国医疗保健流行病学学会/美国传染病学会指南制定了CDI分类和管理的机构指南,并以多种形式提供给主治医师和住院医师。
我们试图确定社区教学医院基于循证指南的CDI治疗的影响。进行回顾性病历审查,以确定2013年2月1日至2014年1月31日期间患有国际疾病分类第九版编码且实验室确诊为CDI的患者的住院时间(LOS)、再入院率、直接成本、死亡率以及医生对指南的依从性。终点包括CDI诊断后的LOS、30天再入院率、CDI诊断后的直接成本和死亡率。
该研究共纳入351例患者就诊。虽然无统计学意义,但发现基于指南的治疗(n = 131)与较低的中位LOS相关(6天对8天;P = 0.06)。30天医院再入院率(25.2%对29.5%;P = 0.39)和CDI诊断后的中位成本(7238.48美元对8794.81美元;P = 0.10)也较低,但无统计学意义。发现轻度至中度感染患者接受基于指南的治疗时,中位LOS显著更低(5天对7天;P = 0.03),诊断后的中位成本也更低(5257.85美元对7680.56美元;P = 0.03)。总体而言,医生对指南的依从性较低,为38%。
基于指南的CDI治疗与LOS和成本显著降低的趋势相关。尽管进行了教育并提供了指南,但医生遵守指南的障碍仍然存在。基于电子健康记录的医嘱集或临床决策工具可能会提高对指南的认识和依从性。