Kurten Erin L, Carson Walter P
Erin L. Kurten is affiliated with the Department of Biology at Stanford University, in California. Walter P. Carson is affiliated with the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, in Pennsylvania
Bioscience. 2015 Sep 1;65(9):862-870. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv110. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Using a decade-long exclosure experiment in Panama, we tested the hypothesis that ground-dwelling vertebrate herbivores and seed predators are crucial determinants of tropical tree diversity and abundance within the understory. Our exclosure experiment is a community-level test of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis. Therefore, we predicted that vertebrate exclusion would (a) increase plant densities and (b) lower richness, diversity, and evenness. Excluding vertebrates caused a 38%-46% increase in plant densities, which, in contrast to our predictions, caused species richness to increase by 12%-15%. Because vertebrate exclusion causes plant species richness to increase, not decrease, vertebrates are unlikely to be causal agents of Janzen-Connell effects. We synthesized this and previous studies to explore why plant richness responds differently to defaunation and exclosures in tropical forests worldwide. Likely because of their contrasting effects on mesoconsumers, defaunation and exclosures cause decreases and increases in plant density respectively, which in turn cause corresponding changes in richness.
通过在巴拿马进行的一项长达十年的围栏实验,我们检验了这样一个假设:地面栖息的脊椎动物食草动物和种子捕食者是林下热带树木多样性和丰度的关键决定因素。我们的围栏实验是对扬森 - 康奈尔假说的群落水平测试。因此,我们预测排除脊椎动物会(a)增加植物密度,以及(b)降低丰富度、多样性和均匀度。排除脊椎动物导致植物密度增加了38% - 46%,但与我们的预测相反,物种丰富度增加了12% - 15%。由于排除脊椎动物导致植物物种丰富度增加而非减少,脊椎动物不太可能是扬森 - 康奈尔效应的因果因素。我们综合了这项研究和之前的研究,以探究为什么全球热带森林中植物丰富度对动物灭绝和围栏实验的反应不同。可能是由于它们对中型消费者的相反影响,动物灭绝和围栏实验分别导致植物密度降低和增加,进而导致丰富度相应变化。