• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏复律除颤器发生器更换的风险与获益评估:一项系统评价

Estimating the Risks and Benefits of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Replacement: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Lewis Krystina B, Stacey Dawn, Carroll Sandra L, Boland Laura, Sikora Lindsey, Birnie David

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;39(7):709-22. doi: 10.1111/pace.12850. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1111/pace.12850
PMID:26969818
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every 4-7 years an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) pulse generator must be replaced surgically. This procedure is not without risk. In some cases, the risk versus benefit ratio may be against replacement. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on risks, benefits, and costs related to ICD replacement.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases from 2000 onward. Literature screening, quality appraisal, and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Outcomes included major and minor complications, ICD therapies, and costs, which were synthesized descriptively.

RESULTS

Of 1,483 citations, 17 nonrandomized studies met criteria. Median rate of major complications was 4.05% (range 0.55-7.37%) and minor complications was 3.50% (range 0.36-7.37%). Without non-ICD control groups, the true risk reduction provided by the ICD following replacement is unknown. Following ICD replacement, annualized rate of appropriate ICD therapy was 10.52% (range 2.42-75.00%). Of these, patients without therapies during their first generator life and those no longer meeting ICD criteria received appropriate therapies at nontrivial rates.

CONCLUSION

Rates of complications associated with ICD replacement are substantial. No study had nonreplacement groups, hence the true risk reduction provided by the ICD following replacement is unknown. Our analysis did not identify a subgroup at low risk of therapies following replacement. Shared discussions should occur with patients about the evidence, healthcare goals, risk tolerances, and feelings about life and death trade-offs to enable high-quality decisions about ICD replacement.

摘要

背景

每4至7年,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)脉冲发生器必须通过手术进行更换。此 procedure 并非毫无风险。在某些情况下,风险与收益比可能不利于进行更换。我们旨在综合关于ICD更换相关的风险、益处和成本的证据。

方法

使用2000年起的电子数据库进行系统评价。文献筛选、质量评估和数据提取由两名 reviewers 独立进行。结局包括 major 和 minor 并发症、ICD治疗及成本,对其进行描述性综合分析。

结果

在1483篇文献中,17项非随机研究符合标准。major 并发症的中位数发生率为4.05%(范围0.55 - 7.37%),minor 并发症为3.50%(范围0.36 - 7.37%)。由于没有非ICD对照组,更换后ICD所提供的真正风险降低情况未知。ICD更换后,适当ICD治疗的年化率为10.52%(范围2.42 - 75.00%)。其中,在首个发生器使用寿命期间未接受治疗的患者以及不再符合ICD标准的患者接受适当治疗的比例相当可观。

结论

与ICD更换相关的并发症发生率较高。没有研究设置不更换组,因此更换后ICD所提供的真正风险降低情况未知。我们的分析未识别出更换后治疗风险较低的亚组。应与患者共同讨论相关证据、医疗保健目标、风险承受能力以及对生死权衡的看法,以便就ICD更换做出高质量决策。

相似文献

1
Estimating the Risks and Benefits of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Replacement: A Systematic Review.植入式心脏复律除颤器发生器更换的风险与获益评估:一项系统评价
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;39(7):709-22. doi: 10.1111/pace.12850. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
2
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.对不同患者群体中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的效果和成本相关证据的综述,以及在英国背景下对这些群体的成本效益和成本效用进行建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270.
3
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Brugada Syndrome: A 30-Year Single-Center Experience.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗Brugada综合征:30年单中心经验
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;11(6):1174-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Original research: deactivation of ICDs at the end of life: a systematic review of clinical practices and provider and patient attitudes.原始研究:生命末期 ICD 的去激活:临床实践以及提供者和患者态度的系统评价。
Am J Nurs. 2011 Oct;111(10):26-35. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000406411.49438.91.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Association of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy with All-Cause Mortality-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗与全因死亡率的关联——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12766. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
10
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventive implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in contemporary clinical practice: need for more stringent selection criteria.当代临床实践中的预防性植入式心脏转复除颤器治疗:需要更严格的选择标准。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3656-3662. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13506. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
2
Co-construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement.与患者共同构建卫生技术评估建议:以心脏除颤器更换为例。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):182-192. doi: 10.1111/hex.12989. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Premature battery depletion with St. Jude Medical ICD and CRT-D devices: Indian Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for physicians.
圣犹达医疗公司植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的电池过早耗尽:印度心律协会给医生的指南
Indian Heart J. 2019 Jan-Feb;71(1):12-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
4
ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.ENDURALIFE 动力心脏再同步治疗除颤器设备治疗心力衰竭:NICE 医疗技术指导。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Apr;16(2):177-186. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0354-6.
5
"Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.植入式心脏复律除颤器设备的“实际使用寿命”
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):759-764. doi: 10.1002/clc.22729. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Premature battery depletion with St. Jude Medical ICD and CRT-D devices. Indian Heart Rhythm Society guidelines for physicians.圣犹达医疗公司植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)过早的电池耗尽。印度心脏节律协会给医生的指南。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):194-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Perspectives in managing recalls of cardiac implantable electronic devices.心脏植入式电子设备召回管理的相关观点
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):192-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 14.