Nomura Takahiro, Suzuki Nobuaki, Takamura Shintaro, Kyono Hiroyuki, Kozuma Ken
Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Int Heart J. 2016;57(2):158-66. doi: 10.1536/ihj.15-312. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
The clinical and angiographic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have yet to be fully investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate 3-year clinical outcomes after EES implantation in patients with a history of CABG.We retrospectively enrolled 176 consecutive patients who had undergone EES implantation. Three-year clinical follow-up data were obtained from all patients. Follow-up angiograms and serial quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA) were performed for 139 (79.0%) patients. Patients from the prior CABG (+) group (n = 17; 9.7%) had higher incidences of target lesion revascularization (TLR; 41.2% versus 3.8%, P < 0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (47.1% versus 15.1%, P = 0.004). A landmark analysis conducted 1 year into our study showed a higher incidence of TLR in the prior CABG (+) group (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.017).The reason for EES implantation in the prior CABG (+) group was saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure in 19 (79.2%) lesions, although the target vessel was the SVG in 8 (33.3%) lesions. There were no significant differences in clinical and follow-up QCA data between the native vessel and SVG PCI groups.This study revealed that a history of CABG was a risk factor for TLR after EES implantation. The major reason for PCI after CABG was SVG failure; both native vessel and SVG PCI showed poor outcomes. Further investigations may be warranted to determine which interventions are most effective in this high-risk subset.
在有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)病史的患者中,植入依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的临床和血管造影结果尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是调查有CABG病史的患者植入EES后的3年临床结果。
我们回顾性纳入了176例连续接受EES植入的患者。获取了所有患者的3年临床随访数据。对139例(79.0%)患者进行了随访血管造影和系列定量冠状动脉造影分析(QCA)。既往CABG(+)组的患者(n = 17;9.7%)靶病变血运重建(TLR)发生率更高(41.2%对3.8%,P < 0.001),主要不良心脏事件发生率也更高(47.1%对15.1%,P = 0.004)。在我们研究进行1年时进行的一项标志性分析显示,既往CABG(+)组的TLR发生率更高(20.0%对3.0%,P = 0.017)。
既往CABG(+)组植入EES的原因是19处(79.2%)病变的大隐静脉桥(SVG)失败,尽管靶血管为SVG的病变有8处(33.3%)。自身血管和SVG PCI组之间的临床和随访QCA数据无显著差异。
本研究表明,CABG病史是EES植入后发生TLR的危险因素。CABG后进行PCI的主要原因是SVG失败;自身血管和SVG PCI的结果均较差。可能需要进一步研究以确定哪些干预措施对这一高风险亚组最有效。