Broséus Julian, Gentile Natacha, Esseiva Pierre
Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Faculté de Droit, des Sciences Criminelles et d'Administration Publique, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Faculté de Droit, des Sciences Criminelles et d'Administration Publique, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 May;262:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
The illicit drug cutting represents a complex problem that requires the sharing of knowledge from addiction studies, toxicology, criminology and criminalistics. Therefore, cutting is not well known by the forensic community. Thus, this review aims at deciphering the different aspects of cutting, by gathering information mainly from criminology and criminalistics. It tackles essentially specificities of cocaine and heroin cutting. The article presents the detected cutting agents (adulterants and diluents), their evolution in time and space and the analytical methodology implemented by forensic laboratories. Furthermore, it discusses when, in the history of the illicit drug, cutting may take place. Moreover, researches studying how much cutting occurs in the country of destination are analysed. Lastly, the reasons for cutting are addressed. According to the literature, adulterants are added during production of the illicit drug or at a relatively high level of its distribution chain (e.g. before the product arrives in the country of destination or just after its importation in the latter). Their addition seems hardly justified by the only desire to increase profits or to harm consumers' health. Instead, adulteration would be performed to enhance or to mimic the illicit drug effects or to facilitate administration of the drug. Nowadays, caffeine, diltiazem, hydroxyzine, levamisole, lidocaïne and phenacetin are frequently detected in cocaine specimens, while paracetamol and caffeine are almost exclusively identified in heroin specimens. This may reveal differences in the respective structures of production and/or distribution of cocaine and heroin. As the relevant information about cutting is spread across different scientific fields, a close collaboration should be set up to collect essential and unified data to improve knowledge and provide information for monitoring, control and harm reduction purposes. More research, on several areas of investigation, should be carried out to gather relevant information.
非法毒品掺假是一个复杂的问题,需要整合成瘾研究、毒理学、犯罪学和刑事科学等多领域的知识。因此,法医界对掺假现象了解并不深入。本综述旨在通过主要收集犯罪学和刑事科学领域的信息,解读掺假现象的各个方面。它主要探讨了可卡因和海洛因掺假的具体情况。文章介绍了检测到的掺假剂( adulterants,指掺入杂质以增加重量或体积的物质; diluents,指稀释剂),它们在时间和空间上的变化以及法医实验室采用的分析方法。此外,还讨论了非法毒品历史上掺假可能发生的时间。同时,分析了关于目的地国家掺假程度的研究。最后,探讨了掺假的原因。根据文献记载,掺假剂是在非法毒品生产过程中或在其分销链的较高层级添加的(例如在产品抵达目的地国家之前或刚进口到该国之后)。其添加的原因似乎不仅仅是为了增加利润或损害消费者健康。相反,掺假是为了增强或模仿非法毒品的效果,或者便于毒品的施用。如今,在可卡因样本中经常检测到咖啡因、地尔硫卓、羟嗪、左旋咪唑、利多卡因和非那西丁,而在海洛因样本中几乎只检测到对乙酰氨基酚和咖啡因。这可能揭示了可卡因和海洛因在生产和/或分销结构上的差异。由于有关掺假的相关信息分散在不同的科学领域,应建立密切合作以收集必要且统一的数据,以增进了解,并为监测、控制和减少危害提供信息。应在多个调查领域开展更多研究,以收集相关信息。