Bonios Michael J, Selzman Craig H, Gilbert Edward M, McKellar Stephen H, Koliopoulou Antigoni, Strege Jennifer L, Nativi Jose N, Fang James C, Stehlik Josef, Drakos Stavros G
From the Divisions of *Cardiovascular Medicine and †Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiac Mechanical Support Program; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
ASAIO J. 2017 Jan/Feb;63(1):e6-e9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000369.
We present the case of two patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and moderate aortic valve regurgitation that were treated with a bioprosthetic valve at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A few months later, patients revealed partial recovery in the left ventricle systolic function. Both patients, during the LVAD turndown protocol, reported the onset of chest pain. The transthoracic echocardiography revealed the presence of a new transaortic pressure gradient. We confirmed the presence of a fused bioprosthetic valve by further performing a transesophageal echocardiogram and a left and right heart catheterization. Replacement of aortic valve at the time of an LVAD implantation constitutes a challenging case. Although a mechanical valve is contraindicated due to the increased thromboembolic risk, selecting a bioprosthetic valve increases the risk of valve leaflets fusion. The consequences of this phenomenon should be acknowledged in LVAD patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic, especially under the view of LVAD explantation for those revealing myocardial recovery under mechanical unloading.
我们报告了两例特发性扩张型心肌病合并中度主动脉瓣反流的患者,他们在植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)时接受了生物瓣膜治疗。几个月后,患者左心室收缩功能出现部分恢复。两名患者在LVAD降低功率方案期间均报告出现胸痛。经胸超声心动图显示存在新的经主动脉压力梯度。通过进一步进行经食管超声心动图以及左右心导管检查,我们证实了生物瓣膜融合的存在。在LVAD植入时更换主动脉瓣是一个具有挑战性的病例。尽管由于血栓栓塞风险增加,机械瓣膜是禁忌的,但选择生物瓣膜会增加瓣膜小叶融合的风险。在接受生物瓣膜主动脉瓣置换的LVAD患者中,应认识到这种现象的后果,特别是对于那些在机械卸载下显示心肌恢复而需要进行LVAD取出的患者。