Maronpot R R, Harada T, Murthy A S, Boorman G A
National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Toxicol Pathol. 1989;17(4 Pt 1):675-83; discussion 683-4. doi: 10.1177/0192623389017004112.
Altered hepatocellular foci (AHF) can be reliably identified in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of liver from interim and final sacrifice intervals in 2-yr carcinogenicity studies in rats. While most AHF can be categorized on the basis of a defined set of descriptive terms, viz., basophilic, eosinophilic, clear vacuolated, and mixed foci, exposure to hepatocarcinogenic agents may induce unique types of AHF which should be distinguished from those that occur more commonly. It is proposed that unique treatment-associated AHF be classified as atypical AHF and that they be completely described in the pathology narrative accompanying the study. Since profound changes in the number and size of AHF have been documented in Fischer 344 rats with mononuclear cell leukemia, it is recommended that liver focus data from leukemic animals be censored in assessing potential effects of treatment on AHF. At the present time, there are insufficient data to allow routine use of AHF in regulatory decision-making in the absence of a liver tumor response. However, such data may form part of weight-of-evidence considerations used by regulatory bodies when accompanied by a concomitant liver tumor response.
在大鼠两年期致癌性研究中,于中期和终末处死时间点采集的肝脏苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色切片中,可可靠识别肝细胞灶性病变(AHF)。虽然大多数AHF可根据一组明确的描述性术语进行分类,即嗜碱性、嗜酸性、透明空泡性和混合性病灶,但接触肝癌致癌剂可能会诱导出独特类型的AHF,应将其与更常见的AHF区分开来。建议将与治疗相关的独特AHF归类为非典型AHF,并在研究附带的病理学叙述中对其进行完整描述。由于已记录到患有单核细胞白血病的Fischer 344大鼠的AHF数量和大小发生了显著变化,因此建议在评估治疗对AHF的潜在影响时,对白血病动物的肝脏病灶数据进行审查。目前,在没有肝脏肿瘤反应的情况下,尚无足够数据支持在监管决策中常规使用AHF。然而,当伴有相应的肝脏肿瘤反应时,此类数据可能构成监管机构证据权重考量的一部分。