Betz Marian E, Miller Matthew, Barber Catherine, Beaty Brenda, Miller Ivan, Camargo Carlos A, Boudreaux Edwin D
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Harvard Injury Control Research Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Jun;33(6):502-11. doi: 10.1002/da.22486. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Reducing access to lethal means (especially firearms) might prevent suicide, but counseling of at-risk individuals about this strategy may not be routine. Among emergency department (ED) patients with suicidal ideation or attempts (SI/SA), we sought to describe home firearm access and examine ED provider assessment of access to lethal means.
This secondary analysis used data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation, a three-phase, eight-center study of adult ED patients with SI/SA (2010-2013). Research staff surveyed participants about suicide-related factors (including home firearms) and later reviewed the ED chart (including documented assessment of lethal means access).
Among 1,358 patients with SI/SA, 11% (95% CI: 10-13%) reported ≥1 firearm at home; rates varied across sites (range: 6-26%) but not over time. On chart review, 50% (95% CI: 47-52%) of patients had documentation of lethal means access assessment. Frequency of documented assessment increased over study phases (40-60%, P < .001) but was not associated with state firearm ownership rates. Among the 337 (25%, 95% CI: 23-27%) patients discharged to home, 55% (95% CI: 49-60%) had no documentation of lethal means assessment; of these, 13% (95% CI: 8-19%; n = 24) actually had ≥1 firearm at home. Among all those reporting ≥1 home firearm to study staff, only half (50%, 95% CI: 42-59%) had provider documentation of assessment of lethal means access.
Among these ED patients with SI/SA, many did not have documented assessment of home access to lethal means, including patients who were discharged home and had ≥1 firearm at home.
减少获取致命手段(尤其是枪支)的途径可能预防自杀,但针对高危个体就这一策略进行咨询可能并非常规做法。在有自杀意念或自杀未遂(SI/SA)的急诊科(ED)患者中,我们试图描述其家中枪支的获取情况,并检查急诊科医护人员对获取致命手段的评估。
这项二次分析使用了来自急诊科安全评估与随访评价的数据,这是一项针对有SI/SA的成年急诊科患者的三阶段、八中心研究(2010 - 2013年)。研究人员就自杀相关因素(包括家中枪支)对参与者进行了调查,随后查阅了急诊科病历(包括对获取致命手段的记录评估)。
在1358例有SI/SA的患者中,11%(95%置信区间:10 - 13%)报告家中有≥1支枪支;各研究地点的比例有所不同(范围:6 - 26%),但未随时间变化。查阅病历发现,50%(95%置信区间:47 - 52%)的患者有获取致命手段评估的记录。记录评估的频率在研究阶段有所增加(40 - 60%,P <.001),但与各州枪支拥有率无关。在337例(25%,95%置信区间:23 - 27%)出院回家的患者中,55%(95%置信区间:49 - 60%)没有获取致命手段评估的记录;其中,13%(95%置信区间:8 - 19%;n = 24)实际上家中有≥1支枪支。在向研究人员报告家中有≥1支枪支的所有患者中,只有一半(50%,95%置信区间:42 - 59%)有医护人员对获取致命手段评估的记录。
在这些有SI/SA的急诊科患者中,许多患者没有关于家中获取致命手段的记录评估,包括那些出院回家且家中有≥1支枪支的患者。