Mestre Sandrine, Veye Florent, Perez-Martin Antonia, Behar Thomas, Triboulet Jean, Berron Nicolas, Demattei Christophe, Quéré Isabelle
Internal and Vascular Medicine Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France; Dysfunctions of Vascular Interfaces Laboratory EA2992, Montpellier 1, University, Montpellier and Nimes, France.
Montpellier Laboratory of Informatics, Robotics, and Microelectronics, Montpellier, France.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014 Jan;2(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
Measurement of limb volume is helpful for the evaluation and follow-up of edema, especially in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) or lymphedema. Water displacement (WD) is the reference method for limb volumetry but is not really suitable for clinical routine. Indirect volumetry based on circumference measurements as well as the more expansive but automatic optoelectronic techniques do not allow detailed measurement at the extremity of the limb.
We used a self-positioning laser scanner with dynamic referencing for acquisition and real-time three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the lower limb volume in 30 patients with CVI, 30 patients with lymphedema, and 30 healthy controls. Two independent observers performed either one or two laser scans, whose results were tested for intra- and interobserver reproducibility and compared with WD volumetry by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman graphic analysis.
Automatic volume calculation from 3D laser scanning data failed in one patient with major lymphedema. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, for intraobserver no. 1 and no. 2, 0.98 for interobserver reproducibility, and 0.98 and 0.96, respectively, for observer no. 1 and observer no. 2 vs WD comparison. The 3D laser scanning yielded 1.99% precision. Accuracy was 3.12% for observer no. 1 and 2.71% for observer no. 2, laser scanning values being 90 mL higher than WD, which could be attributed to the different posture during measurement.
Three-dimensional laser scanning is accurate and reproducible, and appears suitable for the evaluation of limb volume in patients with CVI or lymphedema.
肢体体积测量有助于水肿的评估和随访,尤其是在慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)或淋巴水肿患者中。水置换法(WD)是肢体容积测量的参考方法,但并不真正适用于临床常规。基于周长测量的间接容积测量法以及更昂贵但自动的光电技术无法对肢体末端进行详细测量。
我们使用具有动态参考的自定位激光扫描仪,对30例CVI患者、30例淋巴水肿患者和30名健康对照者的下肢体积进行采集和实时三维(3D)重建。两名独立观察者进行了一次或两次激光扫描,对其结果进行观察者内和观察者间的可重复性测试,并通过林氏一致性相关系数以及布兰德和奥特曼图形分析与WD容积测量法进行比较。
一名重度淋巴水肿患者的3D激光扫描数据自动体积计算失败。观察者1号和2号的观察者内林氏一致性相关系数分别为0.99和0.98,观察者间可重复性为0.98,观察者1号和观察者2号与WD比较的林氏一致性相关系数分别为0.98和0.96。3D激光扫描的精度为1.99%。观察者1号的准确度为3.12%,观察者2号为2.71%,激光扫描值比WD高90 mL,这可能归因于测量时的姿势不同。
三维激光扫描准确且可重复,似乎适用于CVI或淋巴水肿患者肢体体积的评估。