Little M W, O'Connell N E, Ferris C P
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Large Park, Hillsborough, BT26 6DR, United Kingdom; Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Technology Centre, Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HN, United Kingdom.
Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Technology Centre, Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HN, United Kingdom.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4360-4373. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10441. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
A diverse range of concentrate allocation strategies are adopted on dairy farms. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects on cow performance [dry matter (DM) intake (DMI), milk yield and composition, body tissue changes, and fertility] of adopting 2 contrasting concentrate allocation strategies over the first 140 d of lactation. Seventy-seven Holstein-Friesian dairy cows were allocated to 1 of 2 concentrate allocation strategies at calving, namely group or individual cow. Cows on the group strategy were offered a mixed ration comprising grass silage and concentrates in a 50:50 ratio on a DM basis. Cows on the individual cow strategy were offered a basal mixed ration comprising grass silage and concentrates (the latter included in the mix to achieve a mean intake of 6kg/cow per day), which was formulated to meet the cow's energy requirements for maintenance plus 24kg of milk/cow per day. Additional concentrates were offered via an out-of-parlor feeding system, with the amount offered adjusted weekly based on each individual cow's milk yield during the previous week. In addition, all cows received a small quantity of straw in the mixed ration part of the diet (approximately 0.3kg/cow per day), plus 0.5kg of concentrate twice daily in the milking parlor. Mean concentrate intakes over the study period were similar with each of the 2 allocation strategies (11.5 and 11.7kg of DM/cow per day for group and individual cow, respectively), although the pattern of intake with each treatment differed over time. Concentrate allocation strategy had no effect on either milk yield (39.3 and 38.0kg/d for group and individual cow, respectively), milk composition, or milk constituent yield. The milk yield response curves with each treatment were largely aligned with the concentrate DMI curves. Cows on the individual cow treatment had a greater range of concentrate DMI and milk yields than those on the group treatment. With the exception of a tendency for cows on the individual cow treatment to lose more body weight to nadir than cows on the group treatment, concentrate allocation strategy had little effect on either body weight or body condition score over the experimental period. Cows on the individual cow treatment had a higher pregnancy rate to first and second service and tended to have a higher 100-d in calf rate than cows on the group treatment. This study demonstrates that concentrate allocation strategy had little effect on overall production performance.
奶牛场采用了多种精饲料分配策略。本研究的目的是考察在泌乳期的前140天采用两种截然不同的精饲料分配策略对奶牛生产性能[干物质(DM)摄入量(DMI)、产奶量和奶成分、体组织变化及繁殖力]的影响。77头荷斯坦 - 弗里生奶牛在产犊时被分配到两种精饲料分配策略中的一种,即群体策略或个体奶牛策略。采用群体策略的奶牛饲喂一种以干物质计青贮草和精饲料比例为50:50的混合日粮。采用个体奶牛策略的奶牛饲喂一种基础混合日粮,其由青贮草和精饲料组成(后者包含在混合料中以实现每头奶牛每天平均摄入量为6千克),该日粮的配方旨在满足奶牛维持能量需求加上每头奶牛每天产24千克牛奶的能量需求。额外的精饲料通过舍外饲喂系统提供,提供量根据每头奶牛前一周的产奶量每周进行调整。此外,所有奶牛在日粮的混合部分都摄入少量秸秆(约每头奶牛每天0.3千克),并且在挤奶厅每天两次额外摄入0.5千克精饲料。在研究期间,两种分配策略下的平均精饲料摄入量相似(群体策略和个体奶牛策略分别为每头奶牛每天11.5千克和11.7千克干物质),尽管每种处理方式的摄入量模式随时间有所不同。精饲料分配策略对产奶量(群体策略和个体奶牛策略分别为39.3千克/天和38.0千克/天)、奶成分或奶成分产量均无影响。每种处理方式下的产奶量反应曲线与精饲料DMI曲线基本一致。采用个体奶牛处理方式的奶牛比采用群体处理方式的奶牛精饲料DMI和产奶量范围更大。除了采用个体奶牛处理方式的奶牛比采用群体处理方式的奶牛体重下降至最低点的幅度更大这一趋势外,在试验期内精饲料分配策略对体重或体况评分影响不大。采用个体奶牛处理方式的奶牛首次和第二次输精后的妊娠率更高,并且100天内怀孕率往往比采用群体处理方式的奶牛更高。本研究表明,精饲料分配策略对总体生产性能影响不大。