Suppr超能文献

荷兰不同医疗群体的糖尿病护理成本差异?

Cost Variation in Diabetes Care across Dutch Care Groups?

作者信息

Mohnen Sigrid M, Molema Claudia C, Steenbeek Wouter, van den Berg Michael J, de Bruin Simone R, Baan Caroline A, Struijs Jeroen N

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention, and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):93-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12483. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of bundled payment for diabetes care in the Netherlands led to the origination of care groups. This study explored to what extent variation in health care costs per patient can be attributed to the performance of care groups. Furthermore, the commonly applied simple mean aggregation was compared with the more advanced generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to benchmark health care costs per patient between care groups.

DATA SOURCE

Dutch 2009 nationwide insurance claims data of diabetes type 2 patients (104,544 patients, 50 care groups).

STUDY DESIGN

Both a simple mean aggregation and a GLMM approach was applied to rank care groups, using two different health care costs variables: total treatment health care costs and diabetes-specific specialist care costs per diabetes patient.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Care groups varied slightly in the first and mainly in the second indicator. Care group variation was not explained by composition. Although the ranking methods were correlated, some care groups' rank positions differed, with consequences on the top-10 and the low-10 positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between care groups exist when an appropriate indicator and a sophisticated aggregation technique is used. Currently applied benchmarking may have unfair consequences for some care groups.

摘要

目的

荷兰引入糖尿病护理捆绑支付制度后催生了护理组。本研究探讨了每位患者医疗保健成本的差异在多大程度上可归因于护理组的表现。此外,将常用的简单均值汇总法与更先进的广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行比较,以对比各护理组之间每位患者的医疗保健成本。

数据来源

荷兰2009年全国2型糖尿病患者保险理赔数据(104,544名患者,50个护理组)。

研究设计

采用简单均值汇总法和GLMM方法,使用两个不同的医疗保健成本变量对护理组进行排名:每位糖尿病患者的总治疗医疗保健成本和糖尿病专科护理成本。

主要发现

护理组在第一个指标上差异较小,在第二个指标上差异较大。护理组的差异无法通过构成来解释。虽然两种排名方法具有相关性,但一些护理组的排名位置有所不同,这对排名前十和后十位的护理组产生了影响。

结论

当使用合适的指标和复杂的汇总技术时,护理组之间存在差异。目前应用的基准比较可能会对一些护理组产生不公平的结果。

相似文献

1
Cost Variation in Diabetes Care across Dutch Care Groups?
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):93-112. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12483. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
2
[Cost variation in care groups?].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D701.
4
Design and impact of bundled payment for detox and follow-up care.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Nov;82:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Bundled Payment Models for Actinic Keratosis Management.
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jul 1;152(7):789-97. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0502.
7
A cost of illness study of hypoglycaemic events in insulin-treated diabetes in the Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e019864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019864.
10
Innovative approaches to reduce diabetes costs.
N C Med J. 2011 Sep-Oct;72(5):409-12.

本文引用的文献

2
Exploring payment schemes used to promote integrated chronic care in Europe.
Health Policy. 2013 Dec;113(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 14;11:272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-272.
6
Health care spending and quality in year 1 of the alternative quality contract.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):909-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1101416. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
8
Regression models for analyzing costs and their determinants in health care: an introductory review.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Jun;23(3):331-41. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr010. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
9
Time to tackle unwarranted variations in practice.
BMJ. 2011 Mar 17;342:d1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1513.
10
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验