Bloomfield Celeste, Staatz Christine E, Unwin Sean, Hennig Stefanie
School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence (PACE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Infection Management Services and Pharmacy Department, Metro South Health, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 May 23;60(6):3407-14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02654-15. Print 2016 Jun.
Several population pharmacokinetic models describe the dose-exposure relationship of tobramycin in pediatric patients. Before the implementation of these models in clinical practice for dosage adjustment, their predictive performance should be externally evaluated. This study tested the predictive performance of all published population pharmacokinetic models of tobramycin developed for pediatric patients with an independent patient cohort. A literature search was conducted to identify suitable models for testing. Demographic and pharmacokinetic data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of pediatric patients who had received intravenous tobramycin. Tobramycin exposure was predicted from each model. Predictive performance was assessed by visual comparison of predictions to observations, by calculation of bias and imprecision, and through the use of simulation-based diagnostics. Eight population pharmacokinetic models were identified. A total of 269 concentration-time points from 41 pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis were collected for external evaluation. Three models consistently performed best in all evaluations and had mean errors ranging from -0.4 to 1.8 mg/liter, relative mean errors ranging from 4.9 to 29.4%, and root mean square errors ranging from 47.8 to 66.9%. Simulation-based diagnostics supported these findings. Models that allowed a two-compartment disposition generally had better predictive performance than those that used a one-compartment disposition model. Several published models of the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin showed reasonable low levels of bias, although all models seemed to have some problems with imprecision. This suggests that knowledge of typical pharmacokinetic behavior and patient covariate values alone without feedback concentration measurements from individual patients is not sufficient to make precise predictions.
有几种群体药代动力学模型描述了妥布霉素在儿科患者中的剂量-暴露关系。在将这些模型应用于临床实践进行剂量调整之前,应在外部评估它们的预测性能。本研究使用一个独立的患者队列测试了所有已发表的针对儿科患者开发的妥布霉素群体药代动力学模型的预测性能。进行文献检索以确定适合测试的模型。从接受静脉注射妥布霉素的儿科患者的病历中回顾性收集人口统计学和药代动力学数据。每个模型都对妥布霉素暴露进行了预测。通过将预测结果与观察结果进行直观比较、计算偏差和不精密度以及使用基于模拟的诊断方法来评估预测性能。共确定了8种群体药代动力学模型。收集了41例囊性纤维化儿科患者的总共269个浓度-时间点用于外部评估。在所有评估中,有3个模型始终表现最佳,其平均误差范围为-0.4至1.8毫克/升,相对平均误差范围为4.9至29.4%,均方根误差范围为47.8至66.9%。基于模拟的诊断支持了这些发现。允许二室分布的模型通常比使用一室分布模型的模型具有更好的预测性能。几种已发表的妥布霉素药代动力学模型显示出合理的低偏差水平,尽管所有模型似乎在不精密度方面都存在一些问题。这表明仅了解典型的药代动力学行为和患者协变量值而没有来自个体患者的反馈浓度测量值不足以进行精确预测。