Henn-Donassollo Sandrina, Fabris Cristiane, Gagiolla Morgana, Kerber Ícaro, Caetano Vinícius, Carboni Vitor, Salas Mabel Miluska Suca, Donassollo Tiago Aurélio, Demarco Flávio Fernando
Faculdade Especializada na Área de Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):56-9. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600385.
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro and in situ the effects of two bleaching treatments on human enamel surface microhardness. Sixty enamel slabs from recently extracted thirty molars were used. The specimens were polished with sandpapers under water-cooling. The enamel samples were randomly divided in four groups, treated with 10% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or Whitening Strips (WS) containing 10% hydrogen peroxide and using two conditions: in vitro or in situ model. For in situ condition, six volunteers wore an intra-oral appliance containing enamel slabs, while for in vitro condition the specimens were kept in deionized water after the bleaching protocols. The bleaching treatments were applied one-hour daily for 14 days. Similar amounts of bleaching agents were used in both conditions. Before and after bleaching treatments, microhardness was measured. Statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey test) showed that in the in situ condition there was no statistically significant microhardness reduction in the bleached enamel (p>0.05). Significant decrease in hardness was observed for enamel slabs bleached with both treatments in the in vitro condition (p<0.05). Regarding the bleaching agents, in situ results showed no difference between HP and WS, while in vitro WS produced the lowest hardness value. It could be concluded that there was no deleterious effect on enamel produced by any of the bleaching protocols used in the in situ model. The reduction of hardness was only observed in vitro.
本研究的目的是在体外和体内评估两种漂白处理对人牙釉质表面显微硬度的影响。使用了从最近拔除的30颗磨牙上获取的60个牙釉质块。标本在水冷条件下用砂纸打磨。牙釉质样本随机分为四组,分别用10%过氧化氢(HP)或含10%过氧化氢的美白牙贴(WS)处理,并采用两种条件:体外或体内模型。对于体内条件,六名志愿者佩戴含有牙釉质块的口腔矫治器,而对于体外条件,在漂白方案后将标本保存在去离子水中。漂白处理每天进行1小时,共14天。两种条件下使用的漂白剂用量相似。在漂白处理前后测量显微硬度。统计分析(方差分析和Tukey检验)表明,在体内条件下,漂白后的牙釉质显微硬度没有统计学上的显著降低(p>0.05)。在体外条件下,两种处理漂白的牙釉质块硬度均显著降低(p<0.05)。关于漂白剂,体内结果显示HP和WS之间没有差异,而在体外,WS产生的硬度值最低。可以得出结论,体内模型中使用的任何漂白方案对牙釉质均无有害影响。硬度降低仅在体外观察到。