Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Water Res. 2016 May 15;95:220-9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
The current study aims to advance understandings on how and to what degree climate change will affect the life cycle chemical and energy uses of drinking water supply. A dynamic life cycle assessment was performed to quantify historical monthly operational embodied energy of a selected water supply system located in northeast US. Comprehensive multivariate and regression analyses were then performed to understand the statistical correlation among monthly life cycle energy consumptions, three water quality indicators (UV254, pH, and water temperature), and five climate indicators (monthly mean temperature, monthly mean maximum/minimum temperatures, total precipitation, and total snow fall). Thirdly, a calculation was performed to understand how volumetric and total life cycle energy consumptions will change under two selected IPCC emission scenarios (A2 and B1). It was found that volumetric life cycle energy consumptions are highest in winter months mainly due to the higher uses of natural gas in the case study system, but total monthly life cycle energy consumptions peak in both July and January because of the increasing water demand in summer months. Most of the variations in chemical and energy uses can be interpreted by water quality and climate variations except for the use of soda ash. It was also found that climate change might lead to an average decrease of 3-6% in the volumetric energy use of the case study system by the end of the century. This result combined with conclusions reached by previous climate versus water supply studies indicates that effects of climate change on drinking water supply might be highly dependent on the geographical location and treatment process of individual water supply systems.
本研究旨在深入了解气候变化将如何以及在何种程度上影响饮用水供应的生命周期化学和能源利用。本研究采用动态生命周期评估方法,量化了美国东北部一个选定的供水系统的历史月度运营体现能源。然后进行了全面的多元和回归分析,以了解月度生命周期能源消耗、三个水质指标(UV254、pH 值和水温度)以及五个气候指标(月平均温度、月最高/最低温度、总降水量和总降雪量)之间的统计相关性。第三,计算了在两个选定的 IPCC 排放情景(A2 和 B1)下,体积和总生命周期能源消耗将如何变化。研究发现,由于案例研究系统中天然气使用量较高,体积生命周期能源消耗在冬季最高,但由于夏季用水量增加,总月度生命周期能源消耗在 7 月和 1 月达到峰值。化学和能源利用的大部分变化可以用水质和气候变化来解释,除了苏打灰的使用。研究还发现,到本世纪末,气候变化可能导致案例研究系统的体积能源使用平均减少 3-6%。这一结果与之前关于气候与供水的研究的结论相结合,表明气候变化对饮用水供应的影响可能高度取决于各个供水系统的地理位置和处理过程。