Arora Satyam, Doda Veena
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):75-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.165838.
The use of elevated signal-to-cut off ratios (S/CO) as an alternate to further supplemental testing (i.e., RIBA) has been included in the guidelines provided by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention for HCV diagnostic purposes since 2003. With availability of screening by NAT and non availability of RIBA, further confirmation of HCV infection has been possible at the molecular level (RNA).
To study the role of S/CO ratios of anti hepatitis C virus antibody detection by enzyme immunoassays (EIA) along with ID-NAT for screening of whole blood donors.
In this study we reviewed the donor screening status for anti HCV from January 2013 to May 2014. All the donations were screened for anti HCV with fourth generation ELISA (BioRad Monolisa Ag-Ab Ultra) as well as with ID NAT (Procleix Ultrio). The S/CO ratio of all the anti-HCV reactive samples were analysed for their presence of HCV RNA.
On screening 21,115 donors for HCV, 83 donors (0.39%) were found reactive on pilot tube and repeat plasma bag testing (S/Co ratio ≥1) by ELISA. 41 donors were HCV RNA reactive with ID-NAT. 4 samples out of 41 were NAT yields and 37 were concordant reactive with ELISA. The S/Co ratio of anti-HCV reactive samples ranged from 0.9-11.1 [mean = 5.1; SD ± 2.9] whereas S/Co ratio of anti HCV and NAT reactive samples (concordant positives) ranged from 4.1-11.1 [mean 7.3]. In our analysis we found that S/CO ratio of 4 showed positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity of 100%.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that S/CO of 4 for anti HCV on ELISA would have maximum positive predictive value of having donor with HCV RNA. S/CO ratio of 4 is very close to 3.8 which was the CDC guideline. The presence of anti-HCV does not distinguish between current or past infections but a confirmed anti-HCV-positive result indicates the need for counseling and medical evaluation for HCV infection.
自2003年以来,美国疾病控制与预防中心发布的指南中已将使用升高的信号与临界值之比(S/CO)作为进一步补充检测(即重组免疫印迹法,RIBA)的替代方法用于丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)诊断。随着核酸扩增技术(NAT)筛查方法的出现以及RIBA检测方法的不再使用,在分子水平(RNA)对HCV感染进行进一步确认成为可能。
研究酶免疫分析法(EIA)检测抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体的S/CO比值联合鉴别核酸技术(ID-NAT)在全血献血者筛查中的作用。
在本研究中,我们回顾了2013年1月至2014年5月期间献血者的HCV筛查情况。所有献血样本均采用第四代酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA,伯乐公司的Monolisa Ag-Ab Ultra)以及ID-NAT(Procleix Ultrio)进行抗HCV筛查。分析所有抗HCV反应性样本的S/CO比值,以确定是否存在HCV RNA。
对21115名献血者进行HCV筛查时,通过ELISA法检测发现83名献血者(0.39%)在初筛管和重复血浆袋检测中呈反应性(S/Co比值≥1)。41名献血者的ID-NAT检测结果显示HCV RNA呈反应性。41份样本中有4份为NAT检测阳性,37份与ELISA检测结果一致呈反应性。抗HCV反应性样本的S/Co比值范围为0.9至11.《均值 = 5.1;标准差±2.9》,而抗HCV且NAT反应性样本(一致阳性)的S/Co比值范围为4.1至11.1《均值7.3》。在我们的分析中,我们发现S/CO比值为4时的阳性预测值(PPV)和灵敏度均为100%。
总结/结论:我们的研究表明,ELISA法检测抗HCV的S/CO比值为4时,对于确定献血者是否携带HCV RNA具有最高的阳性预测值。S/CO比值为4与美国疾病控制与预防中心指南中的3.8非常接近。抗HCV的存在无法区分当前感染还是既往感染,但抗HCV阳性确诊结果表明需要对HCV感染进行咨询和医学评估。