Chen Li, Ni Cai-Fang, Chen Shi-Xi, Cao Jian-Min, Zhu Hai-Dong, Guo Jin-He, Zhu Guang-Yu, Zhong Bin-Yan, Ding Wei, He Shi-Cheng, Deng Gang, Teng Gao-Jun
Department of Radiology, Zhong-da Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing 210009, China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1288-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
To develop a modified assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (mART) score that may be more suitable for Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Chinese patients with HCC who were treated with transarterial chemoembolization in four hospitals were included. A univariate analysis and a multivariate forward Cox regression analysis were used to identify significant prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). A point scoring model was subsequently developed from the training cohort, and the validation process was performed in the validation cohort.
The study included 259 patients (124 patients in the training cohort and 135 patients in the validation cohort). Increase in Child-Pugh scores relative to the baseline (P < .001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B before first transarterial chemoembolization (P = .001), and absence of radiologic tumor response (P < .001) were identified as negative prognostic factors for OS and were used to create the mART scores. BCLC staging was substituted for aspartate aminotransferase increase in the mART scores. The mART scores differentiated two groups with distinct prognosis by a cutoff score of 2.5 points (22.9 mo [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.4-28.4] vs 8.9 mo [95% CI, 7.5-10.3] in median survival; P < .001). In the validation cohort, the C index in assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (ART) criteria was 0.64, whereas it was 0.82 in mART criteria.
In Chinese patients with HCC, mART score of > 2.5 before second transarterial chemoembolization was associated with poor prognosis. The mART score was probably better validated compared with the ART score.
开发一种改良的经动脉化疗栓塞再治疗(mART)评分系统,该系统可能更适用于中国肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。
纳入在四家医院接受经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的中国HCC患者。采用单因素分析和多因素向前Cox回归分析来确定总生存期(OS)的显著预后因素。随后从训练队列中开发出一个评分模型,并在验证队列中进行验证。
该研究纳入了259例患者(训练队列124例,验证队列135例)。相对于基线时Child-Pugh评分增加(P <.001)、首次经动脉化疗栓塞前巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期为B期(P =.001)以及无放射学肿瘤反应(P <.001)被确定为OS的不良预后因素,并用于创建mART评分。在mART评分中,用BCLC分期替代了天冬氨酸转氨酶升高这一指标。mART评分以2.5分为临界值区分出两组预后不同的患者(中位生存期分别为22.9个月[95%置信区间(CI),17.4 - 28.4]和8.9个月[95%CI,7.5 - 10.3];P <.001)。在验证队列中,经动脉化疗栓塞再治疗(ART)标准评估的C指数为0.64,而mART标准的C指数为0.82。
在中国HCC患者中,第二次经动脉化疗栓塞前mART评分>2.5与预后不良相关。与ART评分相比,mART评分可能得到了更好的验证。