Normansell Rebecca, Holmes Rebecca, Victor Christina, Cook Derek G, Kerry Sally, Iliffe Steve, Ussher Michael, Fox-Rushby Julia, Whincup Peter, Harris Tess
Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK.
Trials. 2016 Apr 1;17:178. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z.
Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes.
We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45-75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis.
Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already 'too active'; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention's duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity.
Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes.
ISRCTN98538934 .
初级保健中旨在增加身体活动(PA)的试验通常招募率很低,可能无法招募到身体活动水平较低且最需要干预的人群。尽管身体活动的益处广为人知,但英国大多数成年人仍然缺乏运动,因此面临多种健康问题的风险更高。我们的目的是调查未参与“PACE-UP试验”的原因,该试验是一项基于初级保健的计步器步行干预试验。这对于未来身体活动试验和项目的成功招募及保留参与者很重要。
我们对30名年龄在45至75岁之间的参与者进行了半结构化的电话录音访谈,这些参与者是从拒绝参与“PACE-UP试验”的人群中有意抽样选取的。招募工作持续进行,直至达到数据饱和并获得人口统计学上均衡的样本。访谈内容逐字转录、编码并进行主题分析。
受访者支持步行作为该年龄组大多数人的适宜运动方式,认可此类研究的重要性以及全科医疗作为合适的开展环境。拒绝参与的主要原因包括:认为自己已经“过于活跃”;现有医疗状况;工作;出行及其他事务。较少被提及的原因包括不愿被随机分组、干预的持续时间、佩戴计步器、认为试验宣传资料不合适以及更喜欢其他类型的身体活动或团体活动。
虽然大多数受访者认为自己活动量足够,但仍有一小部分重要人群因现有医疗状况和其他事务而未参与。未来身体活动试验的招募工作可通过调整活动以弥补医疗问题,并使身体活动干预适应工作和出行安排来加以改进。确保针对患者的宣传资料简洁且全面,以及设备便于使用也很重要。初级保健被视为开展身体活动试验和项目的合适环境。
ISRCTN98538934 。