Olufajo Olubode A, Metcalfe David, Rios-Diaz Arturo, Lilley Elizabeth, Havens Joaquim M, Kelly Edward, Weissman Joel S, Haider Adil H, Salim Ali, Cooper Zara
Division of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):32-40.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
Although high absolute hospital geriatric trauma volume (GTV) is associated with improved outcomes among geriatric trauma patients, the actual geriatric trauma proportion (GTP) might be a better predictor of outcomes.
Adult trauma admissions were identified in the California State Inpatient Database, 2007 to 2011. Hospital characteristics were extracted from the American Hospital Association database. The annual trauma volume of patients 65 years and older was calculated for each hospital. The GTP was derived by dividing the GTV by the overall adult trauma volume and hospitals were categorized into tertiles of GTP. Outcomes were hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR), and 30-day readmission in geriatric trauma patients. Independent risk factors were assessed with clustered multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.
There were 61,915 geriatric trauma patients included from 63 trauma centers. Hospital mortality, FTR, and 30-day readmission rates were 4.99%, 16.07%, and 12.03%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs for in-hospital mortality and FTR per 100 patient increase in GTV were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.90-1.14), respectively. As compared with hospitals in the lowest tertile, adjusted odds of mortality and FTR in the highest tertile were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.48-0.92), respectively. None of the hospital factors measured was significantly associated with readmission. The Wald test revealed that GTP played a larger role than GTV in predicting hospital mortality (p = 0.018 vs p = 0.048) and FTR (p = 0.015 vs p = 0.985).
Treatment at hospitals with higher GTP is associated with lower hospital mortality and FTR among geriatric patients. These findings suggest that creation of specialized services for geriatric trauma care can improve outcomes among geriatric trauma patients.
尽管较高的绝对医院老年创伤量(GTV)与老年创伤患者更好的预后相关,但实际的老年创伤比例(GTP)可能是更好的预后预测指标。
在加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库中识别出2007年至2011年的成人创伤入院病例。从美国医院协会数据库中提取医院特征。计算每家医院65岁及以上患者的年度创伤量。GTP通过将GTV除以总体成人创伤量得出,医院被分为GTP三分位数组。结局指标为老年创伤患者的医院死亡率、抢救失败(FTR)和30天再入院率。使用针对患者和医院特征进行调整的聚类多变量逻辑回归模型评估独立危险因素。
63个创伤中心纳入了61,915例老年创伤患者。医院死亡率、FTR和30天再入院率分别为4.99%、16.07%和12.03%。每增加100例患者的GTV,住院死亡率和FTR的调整优势比及95%置信区间分别为0.91(95%CI,0.83 - 1.00)和1.01(95%CI,0.90 - 1.14)。与最低三分位数组的医院相比,最高三分位数组的死亡率和FTR调整优势比分别为0.71(95%CI,0.54 - 0.94)和0.67(95%CI,0.48 - 0.92)。所测量的医院因素均与再入院无显著关联。Wald检验显示,GTP在预测医院死亡率(p = 0.018对p = 0.048)和FTR(p = 0.015对p = 0.985)方面比GTV发挥更大作用。
在GTP较高的医院接受治疗与老年患者较低的医院死亡率和FTR相关。这些发现表明,创建老年创伤护理的专科服务可以改善老年创伤患者的预后。