Peddada Kranti, Elder Benjamin D, Ishida Wataru, Lo Sheng-Fu L, Goodwin C Rory, Boah Akwasi O, Witham Timothy F
Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Aug;30:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Traditional treatment for lumbar stenosis with instability is laminectomy and posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without interbody fusion. However, laminectomies remove the posterior elements and decrease the available surface area for fusion. Therefore, a sublaminar decompression may be a preferred approach for adequate decompression while preserving bone surface area for fusion. A retrospective review of 71 patients who underwent sublaminar decompression in conjunction with instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal disorders at a single institution was performed. Data collected included demographics, preoperative symptoms, operative data, and radiographical measurements of the central canal, lateral recesses, and neural foramina, and fusion outcomes. Paired t-tests were used to test significance of the outcomes. Thirty-one males and 40 females with a median age 60years underwent sublaminar decompression and fusion. A median of two levels were fused. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain score improved from 6.7 preoperatively to 2.9 at last follow-up. The fusion rate was 88%, and the median time to fusion was 11months. Preoperative and postoperative mean thecal sac cross-sectional area, right lateral recess height, left lateral recess height, right foraminal diameter, and left foraminal diameter were 153 and 209mm(2) (p<0.001), 5.9 and 5.9mm (p=0.43), 5.8 and 6.3mm (p=0.027), 4.6 and 5.2mm (p=0.008), and 4.2 and 5.2mm (p<0.001), respectively. Sublaminar decompression provided adequate decompression, with significant increases in thecal sac cross-sectional area and bilateral foraminal diameter. It may be an effective alternative to laminectomy in treating central and foraminal stenosis in conjunction with instrumented fusion.
腰椎管狭窄症伴腰椎不稳的传统治疗方法是椎板切除术和后外侧关节融合术,可进行或不进行椎间融合。然而,椎板切除术会去除后部结构,减少融合可用的表面积。因此,椎板下减压可能是一种更可取的方法,既能实现充分减压,又能保留用于融合的骨表面积。我们对一家机构中71例因退行性脊柱疾病接受椎板下减压联合器械辅助融合术的患者进行了回顾性研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、术前症状、手术数据、中央管、侧隐窝和神经孔的影像学测量以及融合结果。采用配对t检验来检验结果的显著性。31例男性和40例女性接受了椎板下减压和融合术,年龄中位数为60岁。平均融合节段数为两个。视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分中位数从术前的6.7改善至末次随访时的2.9。融合率为88%,融合的中位时间为11个月。术前和术后平均硬膜囊横截面积、右侧隐窝高度、左侧隐窝高度、右侧椎间孔直径和左侧椎间孔直径分别为153和209mm²(p<0.001)、5.9和5.9mm(p=0.43)、5.8和6.3mm(p=0.027)、4.6和5.2mm(p=0.008)以及4.2和5.2mm(p<0.001)。椎板下减压提供了充分的减压效果,硬膜囊横截面积和双侧椎间孔直径显著增加。在联合器械辅助融合术治疗中央型和椎间孔型狭窄方面,它可能是椎板切除术的一种有效替代方法。