Yip Hon-Kan, Sung Pei-Hsun, Wu Chiung-Jen, Yu Cheuk-Man
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC; Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC; Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Nursing, Asia University, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan, ROC.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;214:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.172. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic, remains the second commonest cause of death worldwide in the last decade. Etiologies for ischemic stroke (IS) vary widely. Atherothrombotic occlusion is an essential cause to which carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a major contributor. Administration of anti-platelet agent to patients with CAS has been shown to reduce incidence of long-term IS. In additional, in patients with symptomatic CAS, clinical trials have demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is superior to medical therapy for prevention of future CAS-related IS. However, CEA is not suitable for CAS post-radiotherapy or those located at higher level of the internal carotid artery; and major complications of this procedure including cranial nerve injuries have stimulated the interest of using percutaneous transfemoral carotid stenting as an alternative approach. Although transfemoral arterial approach of carotid stenting is not inferior to CEA in improving clinical outcomes, it has been reported to be associated with vascular complication and has its limitations in patients with athero-occlusive disease of abdominal aorta or bilateral iliac arteries, level II or III aortic arch, or bovine type carotid arterial anatomy. Therefore, transradial/transbrachial arterial approach has emerged as a novel method for carotid stenting. This article provides a critical review on interventional approaches for the treatment of CAS.
在过去十年中,无论是缺血性还是出血性中风,仍然是全球第二大常见死因。缺血性中风(IS)的病因多种多样。动脉粥样硬化血栓形成闭塞是一个重要原因,而颈动脉狭窄(CAS)是其主要促成因素。已证明对CAS患者使用抗血小板药物可降低长期IS的发生率。此外,对于有症状的CAS患者,临床试验表明,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)在预防未来与CAS相关的IS方面优于药物治疗。然而,CEA不适用于放疗后的CAS患者或位于颈内动脉较高位置的患者;并且该手术的主要并发症包括颅神经损伤,这激发了人们对使用经皮股动脉颈动脉支架置入术作为替代方法的兴趣。尽管经股动脉途径的颈动脉支架置入术在改善临床结果方面并不逊色于CEA,但据报道它与血管并发症有关,并且在患有腹主动脉或双侧髂动脉粥样闭塞性疾病、II级或III级主动脉弓或牛型颈动脉解剖结构的患者中存在局限性。因此,经桡动脉/经肱动脉途径已成为一种新型的颈动脉支架置入方法。本文对治疗CAS的介入方法进行了批判性综述。