State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jul;23(14):14636-45. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6627-z. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Dredging, which is the removal of polluted surface sediments from a water body, is an effective means of preventing the formation of algae-induced black blooms. However, an inappropriate dredging time may contribute to rather than inhibit the formation of black blooms. To determine the optimum dredging time, four treatments were simulated with sediment samples collected from Lake Taihu: dredging in January 2014 (DW), April 2014 (DA), July 2014 (DS), and no dredging (UD). Results showed that typical characteristics associated with black blooms, such as high levels of nutrients (NH4 (+)-N and PO4 (3-)-P), Fe(2+), ∑S(2-) ([HS(-)] + [S(2-)]), and volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs), including dimethyl sulfide (DMS), dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), and dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS), were more effectively suppressed in the water column by DW treatment than by UD treatment and the other two dredging treatments. The highest concentrations of NH4 (+)-N and PO4 (3-)-P in the UD water column were 4.09 and 4.03 times, respectively, those in the DW water column. DMS levels in the UD and DS water columns were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the DW water column, but DMDS and DMTS levels were not significantly different between the treatments. After several months of dredging, surface sediments of the DW and DA treatments were well oxidized, and concentrations of Fe(2+) and ∑S(2-) were lower than those in UD and DS treatments because of material circulation between sediments and the water column. Water content, which is important for the transport of matter to the overlying water, was lower in the dredged sediments than in the undredged sediments. These factors can suppress the release of Fe(2+) and ∑S(2-) into the water column, thereby inhibiting the formation of black blooms. Black coloration occurred in the UD water column on the seventh day, 2 days later, and earlier, respectively, than the DW and DS water columns and almost on the same day as in the DA water column. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the oxidation of the new sediment surface in the DW and DA water columns, suppressing the release of sulfur into the water column, because of a long incubation period. Thus, dredging in the winter can prevent the formation of black blooms, while dredging in summer may contribute to them.
疏浚是从水体中去除污染的表层沉积物的一种有效手段,可防止藻类诱导的黑潮形成。然而,不恰当的疏浚时间可能会促进而不是抑制黑潮的形成。为了确定最佳的疏浚时间,从太湖采集沉积物样本,模拟了四种处理方式:2014 年 1 月疏浚(DW)、2014 年 4 月疏浚(DA)、2014 年 7 月疏浚(DS)和不疏浚(UD)。结果表明,DW 处理比 UD 处理和其他两种疏浚处理更有效地抑制了水柱中与黑潮相关的典型特征,如高浓度的营养物(NH4 (+)-N 和 PO4 (3-)-P)、Fe(2+)、∑S(2-)([HS(-)]+[S(2-)])和挥发性有机硫化合物(VOSCs),包括二甲基硫(DMS)、二甲基二硫(DMDS)和二甲基三硫(DMTS)。UD 水柱中 NH4 (+)-N 和 PO4 (3-)-P 的最高浓度分别是 DW 水柱中的 4.09 倍和 4.03 倍。UD 和 DS 水柱中的 DMS 水平明显高于 DW 水柱(p<0.05),但 DMDS 和 DMTS 水平在处理之间没有显著差异。疏浚几个月后,DW 和 DA 处理的表层沉积物得到了很好的氧化,由于沉积物与水柱之间的物质循环,Fe(2+)和∑S(2-)的浓度低于 UD 和 DS 处理。对物质向上覆水体迁移很重要的含水量在疏浚沉积物中低于未疏浚沉积物。这些因素可以抑制 Fe(2+)和∑S(2-)释放到水柱中,从而抑制黑潮的形成。UD 水柱在第七天出现黑色,比 DW 和 DS 水柱早 2 天,与 DA 水柱几乎同时出现。这种现象主要归因于 DW 和 DA 水柱中新沉积物表面的氧化,抑制了硫向水柱中的释放,因为有一个较长的潜伏期。因此,冬季疏浚可以防止黑潮的形成,而夏季疏浚可能会促进其形成。