Suppr超能文献

巴西巴伊亚州一个城市地区人类内脏利什曼病的相关危险因素。

Risk Factors Associated with Human Visceral Leishmaniasis in an Urban Area of Bahia, Brazil.

作者信息

Maia Zuinara, Viana Vivian, Muniz Eduardo, Gonçalves Larissa Oliveira, Mendes Carlos Maurício Cardeal, Mehta Sanjay R, Badaro Roberto

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia , Salvador, Brazil .

2 Health Science Institute, Federal University of Bahia , Salvador, Brazil .

出版信息

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):368-76. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1880. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The early diagnosis of asymptomatic, acute, and subclinical Leishmania infections remains a challenge for controlling visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Individuals with acute VL represent <1% of Leishmania infections occurring in active transmission endemic areas. In this cross-sectional study with a prospective follow-up, we explored the risk factors associated with acquisition of Leishmania infection in an area with newly identified endemic VL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-four households were randomly selected from the study area, which included a population of 213 individuals (10% of the total population of Pé de Areia, Bahia, Brazil). Clinical and epidemiological surveys were prospectively performed to detect cases of asymptomatic infections, acute VL, and subclinical VL, using the leishmanin skin test (LST), and serological response to two Leishmania-specific antigens: rK39 and rK26.

RESULTS

Within the 92 households included in the study, the prevalence of Leishmania infection in individuals detected by positive serology was 91/197 (46.2%; 95% CI: 0.3937-0.5316) and by LST was 29/114 (25.4%; 95% CI: 0.1834-0.3414). Reactivity to both antigens was detected in 64/197 individuals (32.5%; 95% CI: 0.2634-0.3931). Among 89 individuals diagnosed with leishmaniasis, we found acute VL in one (1%), subclinical VL in 20 (22.5%), and asymptomatic Leishmania infection in 68 (76.4%) subjects. Use of repellents and bed nets showed no significant protection (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.01, p = 1.0). Interestingly, individuals residing in houses with a sand backyard had significant protection against Leishmania infection (PR = 1.24, p = 0.049) compared to those with a different type or no backyard. Moreover, the presence of cat or dog at home was also not a risk factor (dog: PR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80-1.64; and cat: PR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78-1.81). We conclude that in newly discovered areas of transmission of L. infantum infection with sylvatic reservoirs, periodic surveys may be helpful in identifying risk factors for infection and optimizing prevention guidelines.

摘要

背景

无症状、急性和亚临床利什曼原虫感染的早期诊断仍然是控制内脏利什曼病(VL)的一项挑战。在利什曼原虫活跃传播的流行地区,急性VL患者占利什曼原虫感染病例的比例不到1%。在这项具有前瞻性随访的横断面研究中,我们探讨了新发现的内脏利什曼病流行地区与利什曼原虫感染获得相关的危险因素。

材料和方法

从研究区域随机选取94户家庭,该区域包括213人(占巴西巴伊亚州佩德阿雷亚总人口的10%)。采用利什曼原虫皮肤试验(LST)以及对两种利什曼原虫特异性抗原rK39和rK26的血清学反应,前瞻性地进行临床和流行病学调查,以检测无症状感染、急性VL和亚临床VL病例。

结果

在纳入研究的92户家庭中,通过血清学阳性检测出的利什曼原虫感染个体患病率为91/197(46.2%;95%置信区间:0.3937 - 0.5316),通过LST检测出的患病率为29/114(25.4%;95%置信区间:0.1834 - 0.3414)。在197名个体中,64人(32.5%;95%置信区间:0.2634 - 0.3931)对两种抗原均有反应。在89名被诊断为利什曼病的个体中,我们发现1例(1%)为急性VL,20例(22.5%)为亚临床VL,68例(76.4%)为无症状利什曼原虫感染。使用驱虫剂和蚊帐未显示出显著的保护作用(患病率比[PR]=1.01,p = 1.0)。有趣的是,与后院类型不同或没有后院的家庭相比,居住在后院有沙地房屋中的个体对利什曼原虫感染有显著的保护作用(PR = 1.24,p = 0.049)。此外,家中养猫或狗也不是危险因素(狗:PR = 1.14,95%置信区间:0.80 - 1.64;猫:PR = 1.19,95%置信区间:0.78 - 1.81)。我们得出结论,在新发现的有野生动物宿主的婴儿利什曼原虫感染传播地区,定期调查可能有助于识别感染的危险因素并优化预防指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验