• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慕尼黑腕关节问卷(MWQ)——一种用于腕关节疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证

The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) - development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders.

作者信息

Beirer Marc, Serly Julian, Vester Helen, Pförringer Dominik, Crönlein Moritz, Deiler Stephan, Biberthaler Peter, Kirchhoff Chlodwig

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 14;17:167. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1029-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-016-1029-4
PMID:27079377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4832466/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although self-assessment questionnaires for the wrist joint are numerous, most validation studies focus on a specific pathology and patient collectives. In addition the available questionnaires focus on subjective parameters such as pain, usual and specific activities but the range of motion (ROM) as an essential objective parameter in wrist disorders is rarely considered. Therefore the purpose of the presented study was to develop and validate a new universally applicable self-assessment score, the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ), which allows for the assessment of subjective as well as objective parameters of the wrist joint.

METHODS

The MWQ consists of 16 items addressing three domains: pain, work and activities of daily living and wrist function including range of motion and grip strength. In a prospective clinical study validity, reliability and responsiveness of the MWQ of physical active patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Validation study included 100 patients (mean age 41 years, SD 16.3 years; range, 18-77 years). Test-retest reliability was substantial, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 for the three domains. Construct validity and responsiveness were confirmed by correlation coefficients of at least 0.86 for construct validity and for responsiveness ranging from 0.61 to 0.65.

CONCLUSIONS

The MWQ presents a valid and reliable instrument for a qualitative self-assessment of subjective and objective parameters (e.g. range of motion) of the wrist joint. Quantitative measurement of wrist function may not longer be limited to specific wrist disorders or patient groups. The MWQ seems to allow for a broad application in clinical research and may facilitate the comparison of treatment results in wrist disorders.

摘要

背景

尽管用于腕关节的自我评估问卷众多,但大多数验证研究都集中在特定的病理学和患者群体上。此外,现有的问卷侧重于疼痛、日常和特定活动等主观参数,而腕关节疾病中作为重要客观参数的活动范围(ROM)却很少被考虑。因此,本研究的目的是开发并验证一种新的通用自我评估评分系统——慕尼黑腕关节问卷(MWQ),该问卷可用于评估腕关节的主观和客观参数。

方法

MWQ由16个项目组成,涉及三个领域:疼痛、工作和日常生活活动以及腕关节功能,包括活动范围和握力。在一项前瞻性临床研究中,对身体活跃患者的MWQ的有效性、可靠性和反应性进行了评估。

结果

验证研究纳入了100名患者(平均年龄41岁,标准差16.3岁;范围为18 - 77岁)。重测信度较高,三个领域的组内相关系数在0.75至0.83之间。结构效度和反应性通过结构效度相关系数至少为0.86以及反应性相关系数在0.61至0.65之间得到证实。

结论

MWQ是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于对腕关节主观和客观参数(如活动范围)进行定性自我评估。腕关节功能的定量测量可能不再局限于特定的腕关节疾病或患者群体。MWQ似乎可广泛应用于临床研究,并可能有助于比较腕关节疾病的治疗结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/f7ff6a65cbe6/12891_2016_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/dfe7690bedcd/12891_2016_1029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/3e940ebaa77a/12891_2016_1029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/1d37ddae8050/12891_2016_1029_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/f7ff6a65cbe6/12891_2016_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/dfe7690bedcd/12891_2016_1029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/3e940ebaa77a/12891_2016_1029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/1d37ddae8050/12891_2016_1029_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/853c/4832466/f7ff6a65cbe6/12891_2016_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) - development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders.慕尼黑腕关节问卷(MWQ)——一种用于腕关节疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 14;17:167. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1029-4.
2
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems.慕尼黑腕关节问卷土耳其语版本在腕关节问题患者中的效度和信度
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Mar;47(1):105-110. doi: 10.1177/01632787231172276. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
The Munich Ankle Questionnaire (MAQ): a self-assessment tool for a comprehensive evaluation of ankle disorders.慕尼黑踝关节问卷(MAQ):一种用于全面评估踝关节疾病的自我评估工具。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Sep 28;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0344-7.
4
Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).患者自评腕关节评估问卷中文版(香港版)的结构效度。
J Hand Ther. 2006 Jan-Mar;19(1):18-26, quiz 27. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.003.
5
Development and validation of a novel questionnaire for self-determination of the range of motion of wrist and elbow.一种用于自我测定手腕和肘部活动范围的新型问卷的开发与验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 26;17:312. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1171-z.
6
The Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for elbow disorders.肘部自我评估评分(ESAS):一种用于肘部疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2230-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3647-z. Epub 2015 May 17.
7
The Munich Knee Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool for Knee Disorders.慕尼黑膝关节问卷:一种用于膝关节疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
8
[Acceptance of patient-related evaluation of wrist function following distal radius fracture (DRF)].[桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后患者相关腕关节功能评估的接受度]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Feb;39(1):68-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964927.
9
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius.对瑞典语版患者自评腕关节评估结果问卷的评估:在99例桡骨远端骨折康复患者中具有良好的反应性、效度和信度。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(2):94-101. doi: 10.1080/02844310902734598.
10
Validation of an objective device for assessing circumductive wrist motion.一种用于评估环转腕关节运动的客观设备的验证
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Oct;33(8):1293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Correlation Between Postoperative MRI Findings, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and Residual Pain After Arthroscopic TFCC Repair-A Pilot Study.关节镜下TFCC修复术后MRI表现、患者报告结局指标与残余疼痛之间的相关性分析——一项初步研究
J Clin Med. 2025 May 26;14(11):3729. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113729.
2
Can elderly patients regain their preoperative functional level after distal radius fracture type A? Results from a fracture register study using PROM.老年患者在A型桡骨远端骨折后能否恢复到术前的功能水平?一项使用患者报告结局量表的骨折登记研究结果
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 5;10:877252. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.877252. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Munich Knee Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool for Knee Disorders.慕尼黑膝关节问卷:一种用于膝关节疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
2
Outcomes assessment in wrist surgery.腕关节手术的疗效评估
J Wrist Surg. 2013 Feb;2(1):1-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333892.
3
Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS--using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study.
Is the Postoperative Outcome after Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Influenced by Age and Gender? A PROM Study.
桡骨远端关节内骨折术后结果受年龄和性别影响吗?一项患者报告结局研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):1202. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031202.
4
Results of a Retrospective Fracture Register of Distal Radius Fractures Built Up Using PROM.一项使用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROM)建立的桡骨远端骨折回顾性骨折登记研究结果
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 1;9:854828. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.854828. eCollection 2022.
5
The Outcome of Distal Radius Fractures with Concomitant Injuries Is Similar to those of Isolated Distal Radius Fractures Provided that an Arthroscopically Supported Treatment Is Performed.如果采用关节镜辅助治疗,伴有其他损伤的桡骨远端骨折的治疗结果与单纯桡骨远端骨折相似。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 1;9(4):974. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040974.
6
[Importance of self-assessment in functional evaluation of trauma patients].[自我评估在创伤患者功能评估中的重要性]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Dec;121(12):956-961. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0564-x.
7
A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Upper Extremity Trauma.上肢创伤后评估残疾的结局指标的系统评价
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2017 Jul 27;1(4):e021. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00021. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
Development of a German fracture register to assess current fracture care and improve treatment quality: A feasibility study.开发德国骨折登记系统以评估当前骨折护理情况并提高治疗质量:一项可行性研究。
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Dec 4;2(12):474-477. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160086. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects.一款用于测量主动腕关节活动范围的新型iPhone测角应用程序的信度和同时效度:一项针对无症状受试者的横断面研究。
J Anat. 2017 Mar;230(3):484-495. doi: 10.1111/joa.12568. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Development and validation of a novel questionnaire for self-determination of the range of motion of wrist and elbow.一种用于自我测定手腕和肘部活动范围的新型问卷的开发与验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 26;17:312. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1171-z.
在国民保健制度中扩大使用 PROMs--在接受膝关节骨关节炎非手术治疗的患者中使用牛津膝关节评分:一项验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 21;3(8):e003365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003365.
4
Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness.肘特异性临床评分系统:已确立的有效性、可靠性和反应性的程度。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1380-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
5
Development of a danish language version of the manchester foot pain and disability index: reproducibility and construct validity testing.《曼彻斯特足部疼痛与功能障碍指数》丹麦语版本的开发:信度与结构效度测试
Pain Res Treat. 2013;2013:284903. doi: 10.1155/2013/284903. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
The development, validation and internal consistency of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score.诺维奇髌骨不稳定(NPI)评分的制定、验证及内部一致性
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):324-35. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2359-x. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).自我报告的足踝评分(SEFAS)的效度、信度和反应度。
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):674; author reply; 674-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747927. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
8
The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness.新的 COSMIN 指南挑战了反应度的传统概念。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 18;11:152; author reply 152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-152.
9
No correlation between physicians administered elbow rating systems and patient's satisfaction.医生使用的肘部评分系统与患者满意度之间无相关性。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Jun;51(2):255-9.
10
The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist.哥本哈根髋与腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS):根据 COSMIN 清单制定和验证。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 May;45(6):478-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.