Martins Jorge N R, Mata António, Marques Duarte, Caramês João
School of Dental Medicine, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal; Private Practice, Lisbon, Portugal.
Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York; Department of Oral Biology, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal; Evidence Based Dentistry Center, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal.
J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
Complex root canal systems appear regularly on fused roots. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the prevalence of fused roots and root canal merging in the first and second upper and lower permanent molars by using cone-beam computed tomography technology.
A large sample of cone-beam computed tomography examinations was accessed. Maxillary and mandibular molars were classified according to number of roots, root fusions, types of root canal system configurations, merging positions, and merging levels. The Z test for proportions was used to analyze the differences in independent groups. A value of P < .05 was considered significant.
This study included 4120 molars. The prevalence of root fusions was 7.1% and 25.2% for the first and second upper molars, respectively; for the first and second lower molars, the prevalence was 0.7% and 12.6%, respectively. In addition, 8.6% and 10.1% of the second upper and lower molars, respectively, had fused roots with canal merging; moreover, 7.1% and 2.1% of the second upper and lower molars had single or 2 non-merging root canals, respectively. The most usual merging position for the first upper molars is between the distobuccal root and palatal root canals; for the second upper molars, the most usual merging position is between the mesiobuccal root and distobuccal root canals. Merging appears more commonly at the apical level. Significant differences were found between the teeth and gender groups.
When approaching the second upper and lower molars, the clinician should be aware of uncommon morphologies. In our sample, 15.7% and 12.2% of the second upper and lower molars, respectively, had fused roots, which did not present the usual configurations with independent root canals.
融合根中常出现复杂的根管系统。本观察性研究的目的是使用锥形束计算机断层扫描技术评估上下颌第一和第二恒磨牙中融合根和根管合并的发生率。
获取大量锥形束计算机断层扫描检查样本。根据牙根数量、根融合情况、根管系统形态类型、合并位置和合并水平对上颌和下颌磨牙进行分类。采用比例Z检验分析独立组间的差异。P <.05被认为具有统计学意义。
本研究纳入4120颗磨牙。上颌第一和第二磨牙的根融合发生率分别为7.1%和25.2%;下颌第一和第二磨牙的根融合发生率分别为0.7%和12.6%。此外,上颌和下颌第二磨牙分别有8.6%和10.1%的融合根伴有根管合并;而且,上颌和下颌第二磨牙分别有7.1%和2.1%的单根管或2个未合并的根管。上颌第一磨牙最常见的合并位置是远颊根与腭根管之间;上颌第二磨牙最常见的合并位置是近颊根与远颊根管之间。合并多发生在根尖水平。在牙齿组和性别组之间发现了显著差异。
在处理上颌和下颌第二磨牙时,临床医生应注意其不常见的形态。在我们的样本中,上颌和下颌第二磨牙分别有15.7%和12.2%的融合根,其根管形态并非常见的独立根管形态。