Lee Ju Young, Lee Hyun Jung, Kim Yong Kyun, Yu Shinae, Jung Jiwon, Chong Yong Pil, Lee Sang-Oh, Choi Sang-Ho, Shim Tae Sun, Kim Yang Soo, Woo Jun Hee, Kim Sung-Han
Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Internal Medicine, Sam Anyang Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):4005-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01749-15. Print 2016 Jul.
There have been concerns about an association of fluoroquinolone (FQ) use prior to tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis with adverse outcomes. However, FQ use might prevent clinical deterioration in missed TB patients, especially in those who are immunocompromised, until they receive definitive anti-TB treatment. All adult immunocompromised patients with smear-negative and culture-positive TB at a tertiary care hospital in Korea over a 2-year period were included in this study. Long-term FQ (≥7 days) use was defined as exposure to FQ for at least 7 days prior to TB diagnosis. A total of 194 patients were identified: 33 (17%) in the long-term FQ group and 161 (83%) in the comparator, including a short-term FQ group (n = 23), non-FQ group (n = 78), and a group receiving no antibiotics (n = 60). Patients in the long-term FQ group presented with atypical chest radiologic pattern more frequently than those in the comparator (77% [24/31] versus 46% [63/138]; P = 0.001). The median time from mycobacterial test to positive mycobacterial culture appeared to be longer in the long-term FQ group (8.1 weeks versus 7.7 weeks; P = 0.09), although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients in the long-term FQ group were less likely to receive empirical anti-TB treatment (55% versus 74%; P = 0.03). The median time from mycobacterial test to anti-TB therapy was longer in the long-term FQ group (4.6 weeks versus 2.2 weeks; P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in FQ resistance (0% versus 3%; P > 0.99) or in the 30-day (6% versus 6%; P > 0.99) or 90-day (12% versus 12%; P > 0.99) mortality rate between the two groups. FQ exposure (≥7 days) prior to TB diagnosis in immunocompromised patients appears not to be associated with adverse outcomes.
人们一直担心在结核病(TB)诊断之前使用氟喹诺酮(FQ)会产生不良后果。然而,使用FQ可能会防止漏诊的结核病患者出现临床恶化,尤其是那些免疫功能低下的患者,直到他们接受明确的抗结核治疗。本研究纳入了韩国一家三级护理医院在两年期间所有涂片阴性且培养阳性的成年免疫功能低下结核病患者。长期使用FQ(≥7天)定义为在结核病诊断前至少7天接触FQ。共确定了194例患者:长期使用FQ组33例(17%),对照组161例(83%),对照组包括短期使用FQ组(n = 23)、未使用FQ组(n = 78)和未接受抗生素组(n = 60)。长期使用FQ组患者出现非典型胸部放射学表现的频率高于对照组(77% [24/31] 对 46% [63/138];P = 0.001)。长期使用FQ组从分枝杆菌检测到分枝杆菌培养阳性的中位时间似乎更长(8.1周对7.7周;P = 0.09),尽管差异无统计学意义。长期使用FQ组患者接受经验性抗结核治疗的可能性较小(55%对74%;P = 0.03)。长期使用FQ组从分枝杆菌检测到抗结核治疗的中位时间更长(4.6周对2.2周;P < 0.001),但两组之间在FQ耐药性(0%对3%;P > 0.99)或30天(6%对6%;P > 0.99)或90天(12%对12%;P > 0.99)死亡率方面无显著差异。免疫功能低下患者在结核病诊断前接触FQ(≥7天)似乎与不良后果无关。