Dellicour Stephanie, Hill Jenny, Bruce Jane, Ouma Peter, Marwanga Doris, Otieno Peter, Desai Meghna, Hamel Mary J, Kariuki Simon, Webster Jayne
Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Malar J. 2016 Apr 18;15:221. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1261-2.
Coverage with malaria in pregnancy interventions remains unacceptably low. Implementation research is needed to identify and quantify the bottlenecks for the delivery and use of these life-saving interventions through antenatal clinics (ANC).
A cross-sectional study was carried out in ANC across nine health facilities in western Kenya. Data were collected for an individual ANC visit through structured observations and exit interviews with the same ANC clients. The cumulative and intermediate systems effectiveness for the delivery of intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) to eligible pregnant women on this one specific visit to ANC were estimated.
Overall the ANC systems effectiveness for delivering malaria in pregnancy interventions was suboptimal. Only 40 and 53 % of eligible women received IPTp by directly observed therapy as per policy in hospitals and health centres/dispensaries respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for the receipt of IPTp disregarding directly observed therapy was 62 and 72 % for hospitals and lower level health facilities, respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for ITNs for first ANC visit was 63 and 67 % for hospitals and lower level facilities, respectively.
This study found that delivery of IPTp and ITNs through ANC was ineffective and more so for higher-level facilities. This illustrates missed opportunities and provider level bottlenecks to the scale up and use of interventions to control malaria in pregnancy delivered through ANC. The high level of clustering within health facilities suggest that future studies should assess the feasibility of implementing interventions to improve systems effectiveness tailored to the health facility level.
孕期疟疾干预措施的覆盖率仍低得令人无法接受。需要开展实施研究,以确定并量化通过产前诊所(ANC)提供和使用这些救生干预措施的瓶颈。
在肯尼亚西部的九个卫生设施的产前诊所开展了一项横断面研究。通过结构化观察以及与相同的产前诊所服务对象进行的离场访谈,收集了单次产前诊所就诊的相关数据。估算了在此次特定的产前诊所就诊时,向符合条件的孕妇提供间歇性预防治疗(IPTp)和长效驱虫蚊帐(ITN)的累积和中间系统有效性。
总体而言,产前诊所提供孕期疟疾干预措施的系统有效性欠佳。在医院和卫生中心/医务室,分别只有40%和53%符合条件的妇女按照政策通过直接观察疗法接受了IPTp。不考虑直接观察疗法,医院和较低级别卫生设施接受IPTp的总体系统有效性分别为62%和72%。首次产前诊所就诊时接受长效驱虫蚊帐的总体系统有效性,医院为63%,较低级别设施为67%。
本研究发现,通过产前诊所提供IPTp和长效驱虫蚊帐的效果不佳,较高级别的设施更是如此。这表明在扩大规模和使用通过产前诊所提供的控制孕期疟疾干预措施方面存在错失的机会和机构层面的瓶颈。卫生设施内的高度聚集表明,未来的研究应评估实施干预措施以提高针对卫生设施层面的系统有效性的可行性。