Smith G Randy, Ma Madeleine, Hansen Luke O, Christensen Nick, O'Leary Kevin J
Division of Hospital Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Biostatistics Collaboration Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Hosp Med. 2016 Oct;11(10):669-674. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2592. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Hospital medical groups use various staffing models that may systematically affect care continuity during the admission process.
To compare the effect of 2 hospitalist admission service models ("general" and "admitter-rounder") on patient disposition and length of stay.
Retrospective observational cohort study with difference-in-difference analysis.
Large tertiary academic medical center in the United States.
Patients (n = 19,270) admitted from the emergency department to hospital medicine and medicine teaching services from July 2010 to June 2013.
Admissions to hospital medicine staffed by 2 different service models, compared to teaching service admissions.
Incidence of transfer to critical care within the first 24 hours of hospitalization, hospital and emergency department length of stay, and hospital readmission rates ≤30 days postdischarge.
The change of hospitalist services to an admitter-rounder model was associated with no significant change in transfer to critical care or hospital length of stay compared to the teaching service (difference-in-difference P = 0.32 and P = 0.87, respectively). The admitter-rounder model was associated with decreased readmissions compared to the teaching service on difference-in-difference analysis (odds ratio difference: -0.21, P = 0.01). Adoption of the hospitalist admitter-rounder model was associated with an increased emergency department length of stay compared to the teaching service (difference of +0.49 hours, P < 0.001).
Rates of transfer to intensive care and overall hospital length of stay between the hospitalist admission models did not differ significantly. The hospitalist admitter-rounder admission service structure was associated with extended emergency department length of stay and a decrease in readmissions. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:669-674. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.
医院医疗集团采用多种人员配置模式,这些模式可能会在住院过程中系统性地影响护理连续性。
比较两种住院医师入院服务模式(“通用型”和“入院 - 查房型”)对患者出院安排和住院时间的影响。
采用差异分析的回顾性观察队列研究。
美国一家大型三级学术医疗中心。
2010年7月至2013年6月期间从急诊科收治到医院内科和内科教学服务的患者(n = 19,270)。
将两种不同服务模式配备的医院内科住院患者与教学服务住院患者进行比较。
住院后24小时内转入重症监护的发生率、住院和急诊科住院时间,以及出院后≤30天的医院再入院率。
与教学服务相比,住院医师服务模式转变为入院 - 查房型模式与转入重症监护或住院时间的显著变化无关(差异分析P值分别为0.32和0.87)。在差异分析中,与教学服务相比,入院 - 查房型模式与再入院率降低有关(优势比差异:-0.21,P = 0.01)。与教学服务相比,采用住院医师入院 - 查房型模式与急诊科住院时间延长有关(增加0.49小时,P < 0.001)。
住院医师入院模式之间转入重症监护病房的比率和总体住院时间没有显著差异。住院医师入院 - 查房型入院服务结构与急诊科住院时间延长和再入院率降低有关。《医院医学杂志》2016年;11:669 - 674。© 2016医院医学协会。