Suppr超能文献

[血清IgD定量对评估IgD型多发性骨髓瘤临床疗效的意义]

[The significance of serum IgD quantitation for evaluation of clinical efficacy in IgD multiple myeloma].

作者信息

He Jie, Zhang Hui, Jiang Hua, Zeng Tianmei, Chang Hong, Hou Jian

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The Myeloma & Lymphoma Center, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;37(4):288-91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.04.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of serum IgD quantitation in evaluation of clinical efficacy in IgD myeloma.

METHODS

Serum IgD and free light chain (sFLC) levels were determined by immune scatter turbidimetry with SPA plus analysis machine in 29 patients with IgD multiple myeloma (MM) achieving VGPR or better response following previous treatments. The concurrent immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) results were also incorporated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Increased IgD levels were detected in 1 of 12 patients achieving sCR, 2 of 5 patients achieving CR and 4 of 12 patients achieving VGPR, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.5 months, 34.1 months and 15.5 months for patients achieving sCR, CR and VGPR, respectively, with a significant difference between sCR and VGPR groups (P=0.022), and between CR and VGPR groups (P=0.018). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) among sCR, CR and VGPR groups (P>0.05). The median PFS were 7.8, 33.7 and 43.9 months, respectively for the patients with both abnormal sFLC ratios and IgD levels (6 cases, Group A), with either abnormal sFLC ratios or increased IgD levels (10 cases, Group B) or with normal sFLC ratios and IgD levels (13 cases, Group C). A significant PFS benefit of Group A over Group C was found (P=0.033), and no differences in terms of OS among three groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

IgD levels may remain abnormal in IgD MM patients who have achieved VGPR or better response, and IgD quantitation represented a useful assay complementary to the current lab examinations. IgD quantitation assay was of significance in clinical efficacy evaluation and survival judgement, and should be incorporated into the evaluation parameters used for IgD MM in addition to sFLC and IFE assays.

摘要

目的

探讨血清IgD定量在评估IgD型骨髓瘤临床疗效中的意义。

方法

采用免疫散射比浊法及SPA加分析仪对29例既往治疗后达到VGPR或更好疗效的IgD型多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者测定血清IgD和游离轻链(sFLC)水平。同时纳入并分析免疫固定电泳(IFE)结果。

结果

分别在12例达到严格完全缓解(sCR)的患者中的1例、5例达到完全缓解(CR)的患者中的2例以及12例达到非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)的患者中的4例检测到IgD水平升高。达到sCR、CR和VGPR的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)中位数分别为38.5个月、34.1个月和15.5个月,sCR组与VGPR组之间(P = 0.022)以及CR组与VGPR组之间(P = 0.018)存在显著差异。sCR、CR和VGPR组之间的总生存期(OS)无差异(P>0.05)。sFLC比值和IgD水平均异常的患者(6例,A组)、sFLC比值异常或IgD水平升高的患者(10例,B组)以及sFLC比值和IgD水平均正常的患者(13例,C组)的PFS中位数分别为7.8个月、33.7个月和43.9个月。发现A组的PFS显著优于C组(P = 0.033),三组之间的OS无差异(P>0.05)。

结论

达到VGPR或更好疗效的IgD型MM患者的IgD水平可能仍异常,IgD定量是当前实验室检查的一项有用的补充检测。IgD定量检测在临床疗效评估和生存判断中具有重要意义,除sFLC和IFE检测外,应纳入用于IgD型MM的评估参数中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe9/7343088/2caacf3a45df/cjh-37-04-288-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
[The significance of serum IgD quantitation for evaluation of clinical efficacy in IgD multiple myeloma].
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;37(4):288-91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.04.008.
2
Prognostic Value of Serum Free Light Chains Measurements in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0166841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166841. eCollection 2016.
3
[The roles of serum free light chain ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016 May 14;37(5):377-82. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.05.005.
8
IgD multiple myeloma: Clinical, biological features and prognostic value of the serum free light chain assay.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2015 Sep;63(4-5):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with IgD multiple myeloma.
Blood Sci. 2021 Apr 27;3(2):57-58. doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000066. eCollection 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

2
[Clinical characteristics and therapeutic efficacy of immunoglobin D multiple myeloma].
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;22(6):1628-32. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2014.06.024.
3
International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):e538-48. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
4
Immunoglobulin D myeloma: clinical features and outcome in the era of novel agents.
Eur J Haematol. 2014 Apr;92(4):308-12. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12255. Epub 2014 Jan 26.
5
Unusual myelomas: a review of IgD and IgE variants.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Aug;27(8):798-803.
6
IgD multiple myeloma a descriptive report of 17 cases: survival and response to therapy.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;31(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-17.
7
Laboratory characterizations on 2007 cases of monoclonal gammopathies in East China.
Cell Mol Immunol. 2008 Aug;5(4):293-8. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2008.36.
8
International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma.
Leukemia. 2006 Sep;20(9):1467-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
9
Serum free light chains for monitoring multiple myeloma.
Br J Haematol. 2004 Aug;126(3):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05045.x.
10
Immunoglobulin D: properties, measurement, and clinical relevance.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 Mar;7(2):131-40. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.2.131-140.2000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验