From the Departments of Neurology (M.B.-H.) and Neurosurgery (S.F.S., S.A.-H., F.T.C., A.A.), University of Illinois at Chicago.
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1658-60. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013015. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Impaired cerebrovascular reserve in chronic steno-occlusive disease has been shown to be associated with poor leptomeningeal collaterals (LMCs) on digital subtraction angiography and increased stroke risk. We examined the relationship between the degree of LMCs and the flow change with Diamox challenge measured using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA).
Patients with steno-occlusion in the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (MCA) at our institution between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Intracranial flows were obtained using QMRA, and flow change with Diamox (QMRAΔd) was calculated as follows: ([flow after Diamox-flow before Diamox]/[flow before Diamox])×100%. Poor LMC was defined as grade 1 or 2, and robust LMC was defined as grade 3 or 4 based on the ASITN/SIR (American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology) grading system on digital subtraction angiography.
Thirty-eight patients had angiographic and flow data. Ipsilateral MCA QMRAΔd was significantly lower versus the contralateral side (flow, 85.5 versus 135.9 mL/min; P<0.001 and QMRAΔd, 24.0% versus 45.6%; P=0.01). If LMCs were robust (n=12), MCA QMRAΔd was significantly higher (21.4% versus -26.8%; P=0.04) compared with patients with poor LMC (n=4).
We show that patients with more robust LMC have better MCA QMRAΔd. Therefore, QMRAΔd may be used for the functional assessment of LMC as a surrogate for cerebrovascular reserve in chronic internal carotid artery or MCA steno-occlusive disease.
慢性狭窄性闭塞性疾病中脑血管储备功能受损与数字减影血管造影(DSA)上显示的软脑膜侧支循环(LMCs)较差以及中风风险增加有关。我们研究了 LMCs 程度与定量磁共振血管造影(QMRA)测量的 Diamox 挑战后的流量变化之间的关系。
回顾性研究了 2007 年至 2013 年期间我院颈内动脉或大脑中动脉(MCA)狭窄闭塞的患者。使用 QMRA 获得颅内血流,并用 Diamox 计算流量变化(QMRAΔd),计算公式如下:([Diamox 后流量-Diamox 前流量]/[Diamox 前流量])×100%。根据数字减影血管造影的 ASITN/SIR(美国介入治疗与治疗性神经放射学会/介入放射学会)分级系统,将较差的 LMC 定义为 1 级或 2 级,而将较好的 LMC 定义为 3 级或 4 级。
38 例患者有血管造影和血流数据。患侧 MCA 的 QMRAΔd 明显低于对侧(流量:85.5 比 135.9 mL/min;P<0.001 和 QMRAΔd:24.0%比 45.6%;P=0.01)。如果 LMCs 较强(n=12),MCA 的 QMRAΔd 明显较高(21.4%比-26.8%;P=0.04),与 LMCs 较差的患者(n=4)相比。
我们发现 LMCs 较强的患者 MCA 的 QMRAΔd 较好。因此,QMRAΔd 可用于 LMC 的功能评估,作为慢性颈内动脉或 MCA 狭窄性闭塞性疾病脑血管储备的替代指标。