Wang M R, Zhang X, Yang Z G, Li P, Gao L, Chen X H, Wang J, Xiong X, Wang S M, Geng J B, Hao K Y, Xie F, Wang M, Zheng W K
Center for Liver Diseases, 81st Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, China.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2016 Mar 20;24(3):175-80. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2016.03.004.
To investigate the association between the dose and plasma concentration of ribavirin (RBV) and sustained virologic response (SVR) during the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with pegylated interferon-α-2b (PEG-IFN-α-2b) and RBV.
A total of 40 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who were treated with PEG-IFN-α-2b and RBV as the antiviral treatment were enrolled, and according to the therapeutic effect (SVR was defined as HCV RNA maintained below the lower limit of detection at 24 weeks after drug discontinuation in patients who achieved virologic response at the end of treatment, and recurrence was defined as HCV RNA turning positive), these patients were divided into SVR group (20 patients aged 19-55 years, including 10 male patients) and recurrence group (20 patients aged 21-76 years, including 12 male patients). The HPLC-MS/MS was used to measure the RBV plasma concentration at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48 of treatment. The t-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis.
During the antiviral treatment, the dose of RBV showed a significant difference between the two groups (15.01 ± 1.21 mg/kg vs 10.28 ± 2.81 mg/kg,t= 6.908,P= 0.000). The area under the ROC curve reached 0.96 (95%CI0.00-1.00,P= 0.000), suggesting that the dose of RBV had a high value in predicting SVR. When the dose of RBV was higher than 13.05 mg/kg (sensitivity 100%; specificity 85%), the possibility of achieving SVR was also increased. The RBV plasma concentrations in the SVR group at weeks 4,12, 24, and 48 of treatment were 1 894.8 ± 740.7 ng/ml, 2 029.9 ± 547.7 ng/ml, 2 011.8 ± 354.2 ng/ml, and2 093.5 ± 540.3 ng/ml, respectively, and those in the recurrence group were 1 223.1 ± 722.7 ng/ml, 1 286.9±685.4 ng/ml, 1304.7 ± 692.0 ng/ml, and 1 221.3 ± 655.3 ng/ml, respectively. The RBV plasma concentration at each time point showed significant differences between the two groups (t= 2.903,P= 0.006;t= 3.787,P= 0.001;t= 4.068,P= 0.000;t= 4.593,P= 0.000). The results of ROC analysis showed that the areas under the ROC curve at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48 of treatment were 0.76 (95%CI0.61-0.92,P= 0.005), 0.83 (95%CI0.68-0.97,P= 0.000), 0.83 (95%CI0.69-0.98,P= 0.000), and 0.86 (95%CI0.72-1.00,P= 0.000), respectively, suggesting that the RBV plasma concentration had a high value in predicting SVR. When the cut-off values of RBV plasma concentration at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48 of treatment were higher than 1262.5 ng/ml (sensitivity 90%; specificity 60%), 1432 ng/ml (sensitivity 100%; specificity 65%), 1427 ng/ml (sensitivity 100%; specificity 65%), and 1610 ng/ml (sensitivity 95%; specificity 80%), respectively, there was a greater possibility of achieving SVR.
During the antiviral treatment with PEG-IFN-α-2b and RBV, the dose and plasma concentration of RBV have a high value in predicting the recurrence of CHC and the possibility of SVR.
探讨聚乙二醇干扰素-α-2b(PEG-IFN-α-2b)联合利巴韦林(RBV)抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗期间,RBV剂量及血浆浓度与持续病毒学应答(SVR)之间的关系。
纳入40例接受PEG-IFN-α-2b联合RBV抗病毒治疗的慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者,根据治疗效果(SVR定义为治疗结束时获得病毒学应答的患者停药24周后HCV RNA维持在检测下限以下,复发定义为HCV RNA转为阳性),将这些患者分为SVR组(20例,年龄19-55岁,其中男性10例)和复发组(20例,年龄21-76岁,其中男性12例)。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)测定治疗第4、12、24和48周时的RBV血浆浓度。采用t检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行统计分析。
抗病毒治疗期间,两组间RBV剂量差异有统计学意义(15.01±1.21mg/kg vs 10.28±2.81mg/kg,t=6.908,P=0.000)。ROC曲线下面积达0.96(95%CI0.00-1.00,P=0.000),提示RBV剂量对预测SVR具有较高价值。当RBV剂量高于13.05mg/kg时(敏感性100%;特异性85%),实现SVR的可能性也增加。SVR组治疗第4、12、24和48周时的RBV血浆浓度分别为1894.8±740.7ng/ml、2029.9±547.7ng/ml、2011.8±354.2ng/ml和2093.5±540.3ng/ml,复发组分别为1223.1±722.7ng/ml、1286.9±685.4ng/ml、1304.7±692.0ng/ml和1221.3±655.3ng/ml。两组各时间点的RBV血浆浓度差异有统计学意义(t=2.903,P=0.006;t=3.787,P=0.001;t=4.068,P=0.000;t=4.593,P=0.000)。ROC分析结果显示,治疗第4、12、24和48周时的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.76(95%CI0.61-0.92,P=0.005)、0.83(95%CI0.68-0.97,P=0.000)、0.83(95%CI0.69-0.98,P=0.000)和0.86(95%CI0.72-1.00,P=0.000),提示RBV血浆浓度对预测SVR具有较高价值。当治疗第4、12、24和48周时RBV血浆浓度的截断值分别高于1262.5ng/ml(敏感性90%;特异性60%)、1432ng/ml(敏感性100%;特异性65%)、1427ng/ml(敏感性100%;特异性65%)和1610ng/ml(敏感性95%;特异性80%)时,实现SVR的可能性更大。
在PEG-IFN-α-2b联合RBV抗病毒治疗期间,RBV剂量及血浆浓度对预测CHC复发及SVR可能性具有较高价值。