Suppr超能文献

新型酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与伊马替尼在不同风险组慢性期慢性髓性白血病一线治疗中的疗效比较:八项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparative Effectiveness of Newer Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Versus Imatinib in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Across Risk Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Trials.

作者信息

Yun Seongseok, Vincelette Nicole D, Segar Jennifer M, Dong Yimin, Shen Yang, Kim Dong-Wook, Abraham Ivo

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Jun;16(6):e85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved the survival outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In addition to imatinib, 3 newer generation TKIs (NG-TKIs) have been approved as first-line treatment of chronic phase (CP)-CML. These have been preferably used in patients with CP-CML with a high Sokal or Hasford risk score. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes with NG-TKIs as a category versus imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML and to indirectly compare the efficacy of NG-TKIs among each other. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of the risk scores on the complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The eligible studies were limited to randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of first-line treatment using NG-TKIs versus imatinib in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with CP-CML.

RESULTS

The differences in the CCyR, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the NG-TKIs and imatinib were not statistically significant. NG-TKI-treated patients showed a significantly greater likelihood of MMR (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.91; P = .003) and lower likelihood of progression to an accelerated phase/blast crisis (RR, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.67; P = .001) than did imatinib-treated patients. Nilotinib, dasatinib, and radotinib showed significantly greater CCyR rates compared with bosutinib and ponatinib. All risk groups showed statistically equivalent benefits from NG-TKIs for the CCyR and MMR.

CONCLUSION

In first-line treatment, the NG-TKIs as a category showed greater effectiveness in MMR and prevention of accelerated phase/blast crisis progression. Risk stratification was not found to affect the RR of CCyR and MMR.

摘要

背景

BCR-ABL1酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)显著改善了慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的生存结局。除伊马替尼外,3种新一代TKIs(NG-TKIs)已被批准作为慢性期(CP)-CML的一线治疗药物。这些药物更适用于Sokal或Hasford风险评分高的CP-CML患者。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较NG-TKIs作为一个类别与伊马替尼在新诊断的CP-CML患者中的治疗结局,并间接比较NG-TKIs之间的疗效。此外,我们评估了风险评分对完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)和主要分子学缓解(MMR)的影响。

材料与方法

符合条件的研究仅限于比较NG-TKIs与伊马替尼一线治疗成年(年龄≥18岁)CP-CML患者疗效的随机对照试验。

结果

NG-TKIs与伊马替尼在CCyR、无进展生存期和总生存期方面的差异无统计学意义。与伊马替尼治疗的患者相比,接受NG-TKI治疗的患者达到MMR的可能性显著更高(相对风险[RR],0.76;95%置信区间,[0.63, 0.91];P = 0.003),进展为加速期/急变期的可能性更低(RR,0.37;95%置信区间,[0.20, 0.67];P = 0.001)。与博舒替尼和波纳替尼相比,尼洛替尼、达沙替尼和拉多替尼的CCyR率显著更高。所有风险组在CCyR和MMR方面从NG-TKIs中获得的益处均具有统计学等效性。

结论

在一线治疗中,NG-TKIs作为一个类别在MMR和预防加速期/急变期进展方面显示出更大的有效性。未发现风险分层会影响CCyR和MMR的RR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验