Gould van Praag Cassandra D, Garfinkel Sarah, Ward Jamie, Bor Daniel, Seth Anil K
Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK; Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK; Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jul 29;88:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
In grapheme-colour synaesthesia (GCS), the presentation of letters or numbers induces an additional 'concurrent' experience of colour. Early functional MRI (fMRI) investigations of GCS reported activation in colour-selective area V4 during the concurrent experience. However, others have failed to replicate this key finding. We reasoned that individual differences in synaesthetic phenomenology might explain this inconsistency in the literature. To test this hypothesis, we examined fMRI BOLD responses in a group of grapheme-colour synaesthetes (n=20) and matched controls (n=20) while characterising the individual phenomenology of the synaesthetes along dimensions of 'automaticity' and 'localisation'. We used an independent functional localiser to identify colour-selective areas in both groups. Activations in these areas were then assessed during achromatic synaesthesia-inducing, and non-inducing conditions; we also explored whole brain activations, where we sought to replicate the existing literature regarding synaesthesia effects. Controls showed no significant activations in the contrast of inducing > non-inducing synaesthetic stimuli, in colour-selective ROIs or at the whole brain level. In the synaesthete group, we correlated activation within colour-selective ROIs with individual differences in phenomenology using the Coloured Letters and Numbers (CLaN) questionnaire which measures, amongst other attributes, the subjective automaticity/attention in synaesthetic concurrents, and their spatial localisation. Supporting our hypothesis, we found significant correlations between individual measures of synaesthetic phenomenology and BOLD responses in colour-selective areas, when contrasting inducing against non-inducing stimuli. Specifically, left-hemisphere colour area responses were stronger for synaesthetes scoring high on phenomenological localisation and automaticity/attention, while right-hemisphere colour area responses showed a relationship with localisation only. In exploratory whole brain analyses, the BOLD response within several other areas was also correlated with these phenomenological factors, including the intra-parietal sulcus, insula, precentral and supplementary motor areas. Our findings reveal a network of regions underlying synaesthetic phenomenology and they help reconcile the diversity of previous results regarding colour-selective BOLD responses during synaesthesia, by establishing a bridge between neural responses and individual synaesthetic phenomenology.
在字形-颜色联觉(GCS)中,字母或数字的呈现会引发额外的颜色“并发”体验。早期对GCS的功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)研究报告称,在并发体验期间,颜色选择性区域V4会被激活。然而,其他人未能重复这一关键发现。我们推断,联觉现象学的个体差异可能解释了文献中的这种不一致。为了验证这一假设,我们对一组字形-颜色联觉者(n = 20)和匹配的对照组(n = 20)进行了fMRI血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应检测,同时从“自动性”和“定位”维度对联觉者的个体现象学进行了特征描述。我们使用独立的功能定位器来识别两组中的颜色选择性区域。然后在无彩色联觉诱导和非诱导条件下评估这些区域的激活情况;我们还探索了全脑激活情况,试图复制关于联觉效应的现有文献。在颜色选择性感兴趣区(ROI)或全脑水平上,对照组在诱导性 > 非诱导性联觉刺激的对比中未显示出显著激活。在联觉者组中,我们使用彩色字母和数字(CLaN)问卷将颜色选择性ROI内的激活与现象学的个体差异进行了关联,该问卷除其他属性外,还测量联觉并发中的主观自动性/注意力及其空间定位。支持我们的假设的是,当对比诱导性与非诱导性刺激时,我们发现联觉现象学的个体测量与颜色选择性区域的BOLD反应之间存在显著相关性。具体而言,对于在现象学定位以及自动性/注意力方面得分高的联觉者,左半球颜色区域的反应更强,而右半球颜色区域的反应仅与定位有关。在探索性全脑分析中,其他几个区域内的BOLD反应也与这些现象学因素相关,包括顶内沟、脑岛中央前回和辅助运动区。我们的研究结果揭示了联觉现象学背后的一个区域网络,通过在神经反应和个体联觉现象学之间建立一座桥梁,有助于调和先前关于联觉期间颜色选择性BOLD反应的各种结果。