Bailleul Alida M, Horner John R
Museum of the Rockies and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
J Anat. 2016 Aug;229(2):252-85. doi: 10.1111/joa.12471. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Sutures and synchondroses, the fibrous and cartilaginous articulations found in the skulls of vertebrates, have been studied for many biological applications at the morphological scale. However, little is known about these articulations at the microscopic scale in non-mammalian vertebrates, including extant archosaurs (birds and crocodilians). The major goals of this paper were to: (i) document the microstructure of some sutures and synchondroses through ontogeny in archosaurs; (ii) compare these microstructures with previously published sutural histology (i.e. that of mammals); and (iii) document how these articulations with different morphological degrees of closure (open or obliterated) appear histologically. This was performed with histological analyses of skulls of emus, American alligators, a fossil crocodilian and ornithischian dinosaurs (hadrosaurids, pachycephalosaurids and ceratopsids). Emus and mammals possess a sutural periosteum until sutural fusion, but it disappears rapidly during ontogeny in American alligators. This study identified seven types of sutural mineralized tissues in extant and extinct archosaurs and grouped them into four categories: periosteal tissues; acellular tissues; fibrous tissues; and intratendinous tissues. Due to the presence of a periosteum in their sutures, emus and mammals possess periosteal tissues at their sutural borders. The mineralized sutural tissues of crocodilians and ornithischian dinosaurs are more variable and can also develop via a form of necrosis for acellular tissues and metaplasia for fibrous and intratendinous tissues. It was hypothesized that non-avian dinosaurs, like the American alligator, lacked a sutural periosteum and that their primary mode of ossification involved the direct mineralization of craniofacial sutures (instead of intramembranous ossification found in mammals and birds). However, we keep in mind that a bird-like sutural microstructure might have arisen within non-avian saurichians. While synchondroseal histology is relatively similar in archosaurs and mammals, the microstructural differences between the sutures of these two clades are undeniable. Moreover, the current results suggest that the degree of sutural closure can only accurately be known via microstructural analyses. This study sheds light on the microstructure and growth of archosaurian sutures and synchondroses, and reveals a unique, undocumented histological diversity in non-avian dinosaur skulls.
缝线和软骨结合,即脊椎动物头骨中发现的纤维性和软骨性关节,已在形态学尺度上针对许多生物学应用进行了研究。然而,在包括现存主龙类(鸟类和鳄鱼)在内的非哺乳动物脊椎动物中,对于这些关节在微观尺度上的情况却知之甚少。本文的主要目标是:(i)记录主龙类个体发育过程中一些缝线和软骨结合的微观结构;(ii)将这些微观结构与先前发表的缝线组织学(即哺乳动物的缝线组织学)进行比较;(iii)记录这些具有不同形态闭合程度(开放或消失)的关节在组织学上的表现。这是通过对鸸鹋、美国短吻鳄、一种化石鳄鱼和鸟脚亚目恐龙(鸭嘴龙科、肿头龙科和角龙科)的头骨进行组织学分析来完成的。鸸鹋和哺乳动物在缝线融合之前都有缝线骨膜,但在美国短吻鳄的个体发育过程中,它会迅速消失。本研究确定了现存和已灭绝主龙类中的七种缝线矿化组织类型,并将它们分为四类:骨膜组织;无细胞组织;纤维组织;和腱内组织。由于鸸鹋和哺乳动物的缝线中存在骨膜,它们在缝线边界处具有骨膜组织。鳄鱼和鸟脚亚目恐龙的矿化缝线组织更具变异性,并且无细胞组织也可以通过一种坏死形式形成,纤维组织和腱内组织则通过化生形成。据推测,非鸟类恐龙,如美国短吻鳄,缺乏缝线骨膜,并且它们的主要骨化模式涉及颅面缝线的直接矿化(而不是哺乳动物和鸟类中发现的膜内骨化)。然而,我们牢记类似鸟类的缝线微观结构可能在非鸟类蜥形类动物中出现过。虽然软骨结合组织学在主龙类和哺乳动物中相对相似,但这两个类群的缝线在微观结构上的差异是不可否认的。此外,目前的结果表明,只有通过微观结构分析才能准确了解缝线的闭合程度。这项研究揭示了主龙类缝线和软骨结合的微观结构和生长情况,并揭示了非鸟类恐龙头骨中一种独特的、未被记录的组织学多样性。