Shah Sanket U, Harless Ashley, Bleau Laura, Maturi Raj K
*Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and †Midwest Eye Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Retina. 2016 Oct;36(10):1986-96. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001038.
PURPOSE: To compare intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy with intravitreal dexamethasone delayed delivery system monotherapy for persistent diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, subject-masked study of eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema, defined as central subfield thickness (CST) >340 μm despite ≥3 anti-vascular endothelial growth factors injections within 5 months. The intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy (n = 23 eyes) and delayed delivery system monotherapy (n = 27 eyes) groups received treatments q1month and q3months, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline best-corrected visual acuity and CST were similar in the two groups. At Month 7, the mean final best-corrected visual acuity (mean ± SD) was 65 ± 16 letters (mean Snellen visual acuity 20/50) and 64 ± 11 letters (20/50) (P = 0.619), the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity was +5.6 ± 6.1 and +5.8 ± 7.6 letters (P = 0.785), the mean final CST was 471 ± 157 and 336 ± 89 μm (P = 0.001), and the mean change in CST was -13 ± 105 and -122 ± 120 μm (P = 0.005) in the intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy and delayed delivery system monotherapy groups, respectively. The number of injections was 7.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001) in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The two groups had similar best-corrected visual acuity gains. The delayed delivery system monotherapy group achieved a significantly greater reduction of CST compared with the intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy group, with a q3month interval of treatment, and had no recurrent edema at any visit.
目的:比较玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗单药治疗与玻璃体内注射地塞米松缓释系统单药治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿的效果。 方法:对持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者进行单中心、随机、受试者盲法研究,持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿定义为尽管在5个月内接受了≥3次抗血管内皮生长因子注射,但中心子野厚度(CST)仍>340μm。玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗单药治疗组(n = 23只眼)和缓释系统单药治疗组(n = 27只眼)分别每1个月和每3个月接受一次治疗。 结果:两组患者的基线最佳矫正视力和CST相似。在第7个月时,平均最终最佳矫正视力(平均值±标准差)在贝伐单抗单药治疗组为65±16字母(平均斯内伦视力20/50),在缓释系统单药治疗组为64±11字母(20/50)(P = 0.619);最佳矫正视力的平均变化在贝伐单抗单药治疗组为+5.6±6.1字母,在缓释系统单药治疗组为+5.8±7.6字母(P = 0.785);平均最终CST在贝伐单抗单药治疗组为471±157μm,在缓释系统单药治疗组为336±89μm(P = 0.001);CST的平均变化在贝伐单抗单药治疗组为-13±105μm,在缓释系统单药治疗组为-122±120μm(P = 0.005)。两组的注射次数分别为7.0±0.2次和2.7±0.5次(P < 0.001)。 结论:两组的最佳矫正视力提高情况相似。与玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗单药治疗组相比,缓释系统单药治疗组每3个月治疗一次,CST显著降低,且在任何一次随访中均无水肿复发。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024-9-19
J Clin Med. 2024-2-26
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023-12-12
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023-6-30