NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Liver Int. 2016 Nov;36(11):1639-1648. doi: 10.1111/liv.13152. Epub 2016 May 24.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for oesophageal varices (OV) using conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD) is invasive and requires costly monitoring, recovery, and decontamination facilities. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, acceptability and accuracy of a novel, portable and disposable office-based transnasal endoscope (EG Scan ) compared to C-OGD as the reference standard.
This was a prospective cohort study. Consecutive adult patients with cirrhosis were invited to participate. All subjects underwent the two procedures on the same day performed by two endoscopists in a blinded design. Patients completed preference and validated tolerability (10-point visual analogue scale (VAS)) questionnaires on day 0 and day 14 post procedures.
Forty-five of 50 patients (90%) completed both interventions. Mean age was 59 years and OV prevalence was 49%. Patients reported higher preference (percentage) and better experience (mean VAS) with EG Scan compared to C-OGD on day 0 (76.5% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; 7.8 vs. 6.8, P = 0.058, respectively) and day 14 (77.8% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001; 7.0 vs. 5.5, P = 0.0013 respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of the EG Scan for the diagnosis of any size OV were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.95), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.56-0.93) respectively. Corresponding values for the diagnosis of clinically significant (medium/large) OV were 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.0), 0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.0) respectively. No serious adverse events occurred.
EG Scan accuracy was higher for the diagnosis of medium/large OV compared to any size OV. Patients' preference and overall experience of the EG Scan was favourable compared to C-OGD 14 days after procedures.
使用传统的食管胃十二指肠镜(C-OGD)筛查食管静脉曲张(OV)具有侵袭性,需要昂贵的监测、恢复和去污设施。我们旨在评估新型便携式一次性经鼻内窥镜(EG Scan)的技术可行性、可接受性和准确性,与作为参考标准的 C-OGD 进行比较。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。连续邀请成年肝硬化患者参加。所有患者均在同一天由两位内镜医生以盲法设计进行这两种操作。患者在术后第 0 天和第 14 天完成偏好和验证耐受性(10 分视觉模拟量表(VAS))问卷。
50 例患者中有 45 例(90%)完成了这两种干预措施。平均年龄为 59 岁,OV 患病率为 49%。与 C-OGD 相比,患者在术后第 0 天(76.5%比 23.5%,P < 0.001;7.8 比 6.8,P = 0.058)和第 14 天(77.8%比 22.2%,P < 0.001;7.0 比 5.5,P = 0.0013)更喜欢和体验更好(平均 VAS)EG Scan。EG Scan 对任何大小 OV 的诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.82(95%置信区间(CI)0.60-0.95)和 0.78(95%CI 0.56-0.93)。诊断临床显著(中/大)OV 的相应值分别为 0.92(95%CI 0.62-1.0)和 0.97(95%CI 0.84-1.0)。没有发生严重不良事件。
与任何大小的 OV 相比,EG Scan 对诊断中/大 OV 的准确性更高。与 C-OGD 相比,患者在术后 14 天时对 EG Scan 的偏好和总体体验更为有利。