Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛患者中心率变异性与经典自主神经检测对心脏自主神经功能障碍检测的比较

Comparison of heart rate variability and classic autonomic testing for detection of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in patients with fibromyalgia.

作者信息

Lee Kyung-Eun, Choi Sung-Eun, Kang Ji-Hyoun, Yim Yi-Rang, Kim Ji-Eun, Lee Jeong-Won, Wen Lihui, Park Dong-Jin, Kim Tae-Jong, Park Yong-Wook, Lee Shin-Seok

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Medical School & Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;21(4):804-812. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12858. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

Abstract

AIM

Cardiac autonomic dysfunction (CAD) is frequently found in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Thus, we evaluated whether heart rate variability (HRV) is superior to the Ewing tests in detecting CAD in FM patients.

METHODS

We studied 35 females with FM and 25 age-matched healthy females. In Ewing tests, results were added to yield an overall score. An abnormal result on deep breathing, the Valsalva maneuver, or orthostatic standing was counted as 1 point. A change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of > 10 mmHg while standing counted as 1 point, and a change of > 20 mmHg as 2 points. A score of 0 was regarded as no CAD, a score of ≥ 2 as severe CAD and a score of 1 as mild CAD. HRV was measured in two ways: by R-R intervals (time-domain analysis) and by spectral analysis of a series of successive R-R intervals (frequency-domain analysis).

RESULTS

FM patients had significantly lower expiratory/inspiratory (E/I) ratios, lower Valsalva ratios and higher SBP values than healthy controls (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively). In the frequency domain, very low-frequency and low-frequency bands were also lower in FM patients than controls (both P < 0.05). Based on the discriminant analysis of the Ewing tests, 54.4% of cases were correctly classified. The addition of HRV parameters did not improve the reclassification.

CONCLUSION

HRV does not improve detection of CAD in FM patients over classic autonomic testing.

摘要

目的

纤维肌痛(FM)患者中常发现心脏自主神经功能障碍(CAD)。因此,我们评估了心率变异性(HRV)在检测FM患者CAD方面是否优于尤因试验。

方法

我们研究了35名患有FM的女性和25名年龄匹配的健康女性。在尤因试验中,将各项结果相加得出总分。深呼吸、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作或直立位试验结果异常计1分。站立时收缩压(SBP)变化>10 mmHg计1分,变化>20 mmHg计2分。0分视为无CAD,≥2分视为重度CAD,1分视为轻度CAD。HRV通过两种方式测量:通过R-R间期(时域分析)和通过对一系列连续R-R间期进行频谱分析(频域分析)。

结果

FM患者的呼气/吸气(E/I)比值显著低于健康对照组,瓦尔萨尔瓦比值较低,SBP值较高(分别为P<0.05、P<0.05、P<0.01)。在频域中,FM患者的极低频和低频波段也低于对照组(均为P<0.05)。基于尤因试验的判别分析,54.4%的病例被正确分类。添加HRV参数并未改善重新分类情况。

结论

与经典自主神经测试相比,HRV并不能提高FM患者CAD的检测率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验