Piplani Ankita, Suresh Sajjan M C, Ramaraju A V, Tanwani Tushar, Sushma G, Ganathipathi G, Jagdish K, Agrawal Anil
Department of prosthodontics, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Department of prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.161569.
The provisional restorative materials in fixed prosthodontics are basically bis-GMA resins which releases exothermic temperature while polymerization which can damage the pulp. Intrapulpal temperature exceeding 42.5°C found to result in irreversible damage to the pulp. The remaining thickness of dentine after tooth preparation control the conduction of heat released by the resins.
(1) To quantify the temperature changes in the pulp chamber using different provisional restorative materials. (2) To evaluate the peak temperature time of different materials used. (3) To compare the intrapulpal temperature changes with a variation in the width of the finish line.
Two intact mandibular molars were selected and designated as Specimen A and B. Tooth preparation was done to prepare a finish line of 1.2 mm and 1 mm width, respectively. Three provisional restorative materials were considered and they were grouped as Group I-Cool temp, Group II-Protemp-4, Group III-Integrity. A J thermocouple probe was placed into the pulp chamber to determine the rise in temperature. The temperature was recorded during polymerization at 30-s intervals until the peak temperature was reached. The same procedure was repeated for fabricating remaining provisional crowns. A total of 45 provisional crowns were fabricated for each specimen.
Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that there was a significant difference in the temperature changes associated with the provisional restorative materials used. All the three provisional restorative materials were compared for 1.2 mm and 1 mm wide finish line. Integrity produced the highest temperature rise and the maximum temperature recorded was 40.2°C in 1.2 mm wide finish line. However, for a 1 mm wide finish line, Protemp-4 produced the highest temperature rise and the maximum temperature recorded was 40.3°C. It was observed that peak temperatures with Specimen B were more when compared with Specimen A.
Cool temp showed least temperature rise in the pulp chamber. The order of rise in intrapulpal temperature in tested provisional materials using direct technique would be Cool temp, Integrity, and Protemp-4.
固定修复学中的临时修复材料基本上是双甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯树脂,其在聚合时会释放放热温度,可能会损伤牙髓。发现牙髓内温度超过42.5°C会导致牙髓不可逆转的损伤。牙体预备后牙本质的剩余厚度控制着树脂释放热量的传导。
(1)使用不同的临时修复材料量化牙髓腔内的温度变化。(2)评估所用不同材料的峰值温度时间。(3)比较不同宽度的边缘线处牙髓内温度的变化。
选择两颗完整的下颌磨牙,分别命名为样本A和样本B。进行牙体预备,分别制备宽度为1.2毫米和1毫米的边缘线。考虑三种临时修复材料,并将它们分为第一组-低温型、第二组-临时冠桥材料4型、第三组-固美修复材料。将一个J型热电偶探头放入牙髓腔以确定温度升高情况。在聚合过程中每隔30秒记录一次温度,直至达到峰值温度。对制作其余临时冠重复相同步骤。每个样本共制作45个临时冠。
克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验显示,所用临时修复材料相关的温度变化存在显著差异。对所有三种临时修复材料在1.2毫米和1毫米宽的边缘线进行了比较。固美修复材料产生的温度升高最高,在1.2毫米宽的边缘线处记录到的最高温度为40.2°C。然而,对于1毫米宽的边缘线,临时冠桥材料4型产生的温度升高最高,记录到的最高温度为40.3°C。观察到样本B的峰值温度比样本A更高。
低温型在牙髓腔内显示出最低的温度升高。使用直接技术测试的临时材料中牙髓内温度升高的顺序为低温型、固美修复材料、临时冠桥材料4型。