Fu Jie, Peng Lilei, Li Xiaogang
Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou, Medical College, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou, Medical College, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Apr 19;12:951-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S104050. eCollection 2016.
Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2013. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder of adults.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Clinical Trials databases were searched from 2000 through 2015. The abstracts of the annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association and previous reviews were searched to identify additional studies. The search was limited to individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and there was no language restriction. Four RCTs met the selection criteria. These studies included 1,843 adult patients. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were pooled with a random-effects or fixed-effects model.
The results showed that multiple doses (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/d) of vortioxetine did not significantly improve the generalized anxiety disorder symptoms compared to placebo (OR=1.16, 95% CI=0.84-1.60, Z=0.89, P=0.38; OR=1.41, 95% CI=0.82-2.41, Z=1.25, P=0.21; OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.76-1.46, Z=0.32, P=0.75, respectively). We measured the efficacy of 2.5 mg/d vortioxetine compared to 10 mg/d, and no significant differences were observed. The common adverse effects included nausea and headache. With increased dose, nausea was found to be more frequent in the vortioxetine (5 and 10 mg/d) group (OR=2.99, 95% CI=1.31-6.84, Z=2.60, P=0.009; OR=2.80, 95% CI=1.85-4.25, Z=4.85, P<0.00001, respectively), but no significant differences were observed for headache.
The results showed no significant improvement in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder for vortioxetine compared to placebo, and nausea was more frequent with higher doses. So the current evidences do not support using vortioxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Few RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, and more studies are needed to verify our results in the future.
伏硫西汀是一种新型抗抑郁药,于2013年9月获美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于治疗重度抑郁症。本荟萃分析评估了不同剂量伏硫西汀治疗成人广泛性焦虑症的疗效和安全性。
检索2000年至2015年的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO和临床试验数据库。检索美国精神病学协会年会摘要及既往综述以识别其他研究。检索限于个体随机对照试验(RCT),无语言限制。四项RCT符合入选标准。这些研究纳入了1843例成年患者。结果以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。数据采用随机效应或固定效应模型合并。
结果显示,与安慰剂相比,伏硫西汀多剂量(2.5、5和10mg/d)治疗并未显著改善广泛性焦虑症症状(OR分别为1.16,95%CI为0.84 - 1.60,Z = 0.89,P = 0.38;OR为1.41,95%CI为0.82 - 2.41,Z = 1.25,P = 0.21;OR为1.05,95%CI为0.76 - 1.46,Z = 0.32,P = 0.75)。我们比较了2.5mg/d与10mg/d伏硫西汀的疗效,未观察到显著差异。常见不良反应包括恶心和头痛。随着剂量增加,伏硫西汀(5和10mg/d)组恶心更常见(OR分别为2.99,95%CI为1.31 - 6.84,Z = 2.60,P = 0.009;OR为2.80,95%CI为1.85 - 4.25,Z = 4.85,P < 0.00001),但头痛无显著差异。
结果显示,与安慰剂相比,伏硫西汀治疗广泛性焦虑症无显著改善,且高剂量时恶心更常见。因此,目前证据不支持使用伏硫西汀治疗广泛性焦虑症。我们的荟萃分析纳入的RCT较少,未来需要更多研究验证我们的结果。