Candini Michela, Giuberti Virginia, Manattini Alessandra, Grittani Serenella, di Pellegrino Giuseppe, Frassinetti Francesca
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Centre for Children with ASD, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Autism Res. 2017 Jan;10(1):144-154. doi: 10.1002/aur.1637. Epub 2016 May 9.
Studies in children with Typical Development (TD) and with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) revealed that autism affects the personal space regulation, influencing both its size (permeability) and its changes depending on social interaction (flexibility). Here, we investigate how the nature of social interaction (Cooperative vs. Uncooperative) and the person perspective influence permeability and flexibility of interpersonal distance. Moreover, we tested whether the deficit observed in ASD children, reflects the social impairment (SI) in daily interactions. The stop-distance paradigm was used to measure the preferred distance between the participant and an unfamiliar adult (first-person perspective, Experiment 1), and between two other people (third-person perspective, Experiment 2). Interpersonal distance was measured before and after the interaction with a confederate. The Wing Subgroups Questionnaire was used to evaluate SI in everyday activities, and each ASD participant was accordingly assigned either to the lower (children with low social impairment [low-SI ASD]), or to the higher SI group (children with high social impairment [high-SI ASD]). We observed larger interpersonal distance (permeability) in both ASD groups compared to TD children. Moreover, depending on the nature of social interaction, a modulation of interpersonal distance (flexibility) was observed in TD children, both from the first- and third-person perspective. Similar findings were found in low-SI but not in high-SI ASD children, in Experiment 1. Conversely, in Experiment 2, no change was observed in both ASD groups. These findings reveal that SI severity and a person's perspective may account for the deficit observed in autism when flexibility, but not permeability, of personal space is considered. Autism Res 2017, 10: 144-154. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
对典型发育(TD)儿童和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的研究表明,自闭症会影响个人空间调节,对其大小(通透性)及其因社会互动而产生的变化(灵活性)均有影响。在此,我们研究社会互动的性质(合作与非合作)以及个人视角如何影响人际距离的通透性和灵活性。此外,我们测试了在ASD儿童中观察到的缺陷是否反映了日常互动中的社会障碍(SI)。采用停止距离范式来测量参与者与陌生成年人之间(第一人称视角,实验1)以及另外两人之间(第三人称视角,实验2)的偏好距离。在与一名同谋互动前后测量人际距离。使用温格亚组问卷来评估日常活动中的SI,每个ASD参与者据此被分配到较低(社会障碍程度低的儿童[低SI ASD])或较高SI组(社会障碍程度高的儿童[高SI ASD])。我们观察到,与TD儿童相比,两个ASD组的人际距离(通透性)更大。此外,根据社会互动的性质,在TD儿童中,从第一人称和第三人称视角均观察到人际距离(灵活性)的调节。在实验1中低SI的ASD儿童中发现了类似的结果,但高SI ASD儿童中未发现此结果。相反,在实验2中两个ASD组均未观察到变化。这些发现表明,当考虑个人空间的灵活性而非通透性时,SI的严重程度和个人视角可能是自闭症中观察到的缺陷的原因。《自闭症研究》2017年,10:144 - 154。©2016国际自闭症研究协会,威利期刊公司