Kreinest M, Goller S, Gliwitzky B, Grützner P A, Küffer M, Häske D, Papathanassiou V, Münzberg M
Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
PHTLS Europe Research Group, Offenbach/Queich, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):371-376. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0682-5. Epub 2016 May 12.
Spinal immobilization is a standard procedure in emergency medicine. Increasing awareness of complications associated with immobilization of trauma patients leads to controversial discussions in the literature. Current guidelines require to include considerations of accident mechanism, an assessment of the patient's condition and an examination of the spine in the decision-making process if immobilization of the spine should be performed. This requires sound knowledge of assessing these parameters. The aim of the current study is to analyze German paramedics' subjective uncertainty in terms of their prehospital assessment and treatment of patients suffering from spine injuries.
Over a period of 17 months participants in a trauma course were asked to complete a standardized anonymous questionnaire about subjective uncertainty of prehospital assessment and management of spinal trauma before participation in that course. Questions about the frequency of application of different immobilization tools and skills training on spinal immobilization were also asked.
A total of 465 paramedics were surveyed. The participants did not indicate any uncertainty about the prehospital diagnosis and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence was significantly greater in participants who had already attended another course on structured trauma care before. The participants agreed with the statements that standardized algorithms facilitate teamwork and that there is a need for a protocol for the prehospital treatment of spinal injuries.
Paramedics do not feel uncertain about the prehospital assessment and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence in participants who had already attended a course on the treatment of trauma patients before was significantly higher.
脊柱固定是急诊医学中的一项标准程序。人们对创伤患者固定相关并发症的认识不断提高,这在文献中引发了有争议的讨论。当前指南要求在决定是否进行脊柱固定时,应考虑事故机制、评估患者状况并检查脊柱。这需要具备评估这些参数的扎实知识。本研究的目的是分析德国护理人员在对脊柱损伤患者进行院前评估和治疗方面的主观不确定性。
在17个月的时间里,要求参加创伤课程的人员在参加该课程之前填写一份关于脊柱创伤院前评估和管理主观不确定性的标准化匿名问卷。还询问了关于不同固定工具的使用频率以及脊柱固定技能培训的问题。
共对465名护理人员进行了调查。参与者对脊柱损伤的院前诊断和治疗未表示出任何不确定性。之前已经参加过另一期结构化创伤护理课程的参与者的信心明显更强。参与者同意标准化算法有助于团队协作以及需要制定脊柱损伤院前治疗方案的说法。
护理人员对脊柱损伤的院前评估和治疗并不感到不确定。之前参加过创伤患者治疗课程的参与者的信心明显更高。