Cote Susanne, McNulty Kieran P, Stevens Nancy J, Nengo Isaiah Odhiambo
Department of Anthropology & Archaeology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55421, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2016 May;94:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
Limnopithecus is a small-bodied catarrhine genus that is widespread throughout early Miocene sites in East Africa. Although two species of this genus have been described - Limnopithecus legetet (type species) and Limnopithecus evansi - they are poorly known anatomically and their systematic positions remain unresolved. Here, we provide detailed descriptions and comparisons for two well-preserved maxillary specimens that we attribute to L. evansi. These specimens come from the type locality of the species, Songhor in western Kenya, and add greatly to our knowledge of its dentognathic morphology. Together, they preserve the entire unilateral upper dentition, with overlapping elements demonstrating conspecificity, and provide new information about I(2) morphology and aspects of the palate, nasal aperture, and maxillary sinuses. Detailed morphological comparisons suggest that specimens referred to Limnopithecus from Songhor, Koru, and Rusinga share a unique I(2) morphology not found in any other early Miocene catarrhine. This argues in favor of congeneric status for L. evansi and L. legetet. Moreover, features such as a broad palate, premolar morphology, and the relative proportions of the premolars of L. evansi distinguish it from Lomorupithecus harrisoni, another early Miocene catarrhine from Napak, Uganda. This finding challenges a recently proposed taxonomic interpretation that Lomorupithecus and L. evansi are conspecific. Our results underscore the distinctiveness of L. evansi and Lo. harrisoni, thereby reaffirming the validity of the taxon Lo. harrisoni and indicating that the Songhor and Napak catarrhine communities were relatively distinct, despite their apparent contemporaneity.
湖猿属是一种体型较小的狭鼻猴类,广泛分布于东非早中新世的遗址中。尽管该属已描述了两个物种——莱氏湖猿(模式种)和埃氏湖猿,但它们在解剖学上鲜为人知,其系统位置仍未确定。在此,我们对两个保存完好的上颌标本进行了详细描述和比较,我们将其归为埃氏湖猿。这些标本来自该物种的模式产地,肯尼亚西部的松戈尔,极大地增加了我们对其齿颌形态的了解。它们共同保存了完整的单侧上牙列,重叠的部分证明了它们属于同一物种,并提供了关于I(2)形态以及腭、鼻孔和上颌窦方面的新信息。详细的形态学比较表明,来自松戈尔、科鲁和鲁辛加的被归为湖猿属的标本具有独特的I(2)形态,这在其他任何早中新世狭鼻猴类中都未发现。这支持了埃氏湖猿和莱氏湖猿同属的观点。此外,埃氏湖猿的一些特征,如宽阔的腭、前磨牙形态以及前磨牙的相对比例,使其有别于来自乌干达纳帕克的另一种早中新世狭鼻猴——哈氏洛莫鲁猿。这一发现挑战了最近提出的一种分类学解释,即洛莫鲁猿和埃氏湖猿是同一物种。我们的结果强调了埃氏湖猿和哈氏洛莫鲁猿的独特性,从而再次确认了哈氏洛莫鲁猿这一分类单元的有效性,并表明松戈尔和纳帕克的狭鼻猴群落虽然明显同时存在,但它们相对不同。