van Riet Evelien E S, Hoes Arno W, Limburg Alexander, Landman Marcel A J, Zuithoff Peter N A, Rutten Frans H
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;217:174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.171. Epub 2016 May 4.
To assess the effect of training general practitioners (GPs) in the optimization of drug treatment for newly detected heart failure (HF).
Cluster randomized trial comparing the training programme to care as usual.
Community-dwelling older persons with a new HF diagnosis after diagnostic work-up.
Thirty GPs were randomized to care as usual or the training. Sixteen GPs of the latter group received a half-day training on optimizing HF medication in HF patients with a reduced (HFrEF), or with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At baseline and after six months of follow-up, the 46 HF patients in the intervention group and the 46 cases in the care as usual group were assessed on medication use, functionality, health status, and health care visits.
After 6months, uptake of HF medication and health status were similar in the two groups. Interestingly, patients in the intervention group had a longer walking distance with the six-minute walk test than those in the care as usual group (mean difference in all-type HF 28.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 53.1) meters; HFpEF patients 28.2 (95% CI 8.8 to 47.5) meters and HFrEF patients 55.9 (95% CI -16.3 to 128.1) meters). They also had more HF-related GP visits (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5) and fewer visits to the cardiologist (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1).
Training GPs in optimization of drug treatment of newly detected HFrEF and HFpEF did not clearly increase HF medication, but resulted in improvement in walking distance.
评估培训全科医生(GP)对新诊断心力衰竭(HF)患者药物治疗优化的效果。
整群随机试验,将培训项目与常规护理进行比较。
经诊断检查后新诊断为HF的社区居住老年人。
30名全科医生被随机分为常规护理组或培训组。后一组中的16名全科医生接受了为期半天的培训,内容是优化射血分数降低(HFrEF)或射血分数保留(HFpEF)的HF患者的HF药物治疗。在基线和随访6个月后,对干预组的46名HF患者和常规护理组的46例患者进行了药物使用、功能、健康状况和医疗就诊情况的评估。
6个月后,两组的HF药物使用情况和健康状况相似。有趣的是,干预组患者在6分钟步行试验中的步行距离比常规护理组患者长(所有类型HF的平均差异为28.0(95%CI 2.9至53.1)米;HFpEF患者为28.2(95%CI 8.8至47.5)米,HFrEF患者为55.9(95%CI -16.3至128.1)米)。他们与全科医生进行的HF相关就诊也更多(RR 1.8,95%CI 1.3至2.5),而看心脏病专家的次数更少(RR 0.6,95%CI 0.3至1.1)。
培训全科医生优化新诊断的HFrEF和HFpEF的药物治疗,并没有明显增加HF药物的使用,但改善了步行距离。