Gifford Heather, Tautolo El-Shadan, Erick Stephanie, Hoek Janet, Gray Rebecca, Edwards Richard
Whakauae Research Services, Director's Office, Whanganui, New Zealand.
Department of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2016 May 17;6(5):e011415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011415.
Tobacco companies frame smoking as an informed choice, a strategy that holds individuals responsible for harms they incur. Few studies have tested this argument, and even fewer have examined how informed indigenous smokers or those from minority ethnicities are when they start smoking. We explored how young adult Māori and Pacific smokers interpreted 'informed choice' in relation to smoking.
Using recruitment via advertising, existing networks and word of mouth, we recruited and undertook qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 Māori and Pacific young adults aged 18-26 years who smoked.
Data were analysed using an informed-choice framework developed by Chapman and Liberman. We used a thematic analysis approach to identify themes that extended this framework.
Few participants considered themselves well informed and none met more than the framework's initial two criteria. Most reflected on their unthinking uptake and subsequent addiction, and identified environmental factors that had facilitated uptake. Nonetheless, despite this context, most agreed that they had made an informed choice to smoke.
The discrepancy between participants' reported knowledge and understanding of smoking's risks, and their assessment of smoking as an informed choice, reflects their view of smoking as a symbol of adulthood. Policies that make tobacco more difficult to use in social settings could help change social norms around smoking and the ease with which initiation and addiction currently occur.
烟草公司将吸烟描述为一种明智的选择,这是一种让个人对自身所遭受的危害负责的策略。很少有研究检验过这一观点,而研究土著吸烟者或少数族裔吸烟者开始吸烟时了解程度如何的研究则更少。我们探讨了毛利族和太平洋岛裔青年吸烟者如何理解与吸烟相关的“明智选择”。
通过广告、现有网络和口口相传的方式招募,我们对20名年龄在18至26岁之间的吸烟的毛利族和太平洋岛裔青年进行了定性深入访谈。
使用查普曼和利伯曼开发的明智选择框架对数据进行分析。我们采用主题分析方法来确定扩展该框架的主题。
很少有参与者认为自己了解充分,而且没有人满足该框架最初的两条以上标准。大多数人反思了自己不假思索就开始吸烟并随后上瘾的情况,并指出了促使他们开始吸烟的环境因素。尽管如此,尽管有这些情况,大多数人仍认为自己做出了明智的吸烟选择。
参与者报告的对吸烟风险的认知与理解,和他们将吸烟视为明智选择的评估之间的差异,反映了他们将吸烟视为成年象征的观点。在社交场合增加烟草使用难度的政策,可能有助于改变围绕吸烟的社会规范,以及目前开始吸烟和上瘾的容易程度。