Dingemans Siem A, Lodeizen Olivia A P, Goslings J Carel, Schepers Tim
Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Jul;36:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 11.
There is an increasing incidence of fragility fractures of the ankle in the elderly population. The open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures is challenging, due to reduced bone stock quality as a result of osteoporosis. Biomechanical studies have shown contradicting results using reinforced constructions in the fixation of fibular fractures. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of biomechanical studies on reinforced fixation of distal fibular fractures.
A literature search was conducted utilizing three online databases considering biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques of distal fibular fractures. A meta-analysis was performed on two biomechanical outcome measures; torsional stiffness and torque to failure.
In a total number of 13 studies 8 different reinforcement techniques were identified. Of these studies, six compared locked lateral plating with conventional lateral plating. There were no statistically significant differences between the locking and non-locking lateral plate for torque to failure or torsional stiffness. Locked plating strength was independent from bone mineral density in four studies. An antiglide plate proved to be biomechanically superior compared to a lateral plate in one study and to a locked plate in another.
Locked lateral plates are not biomechanically superior to conventional lateral plates. However the strength of locked plating may be independent of bone mineral density and could make this technique more suitable in the fixation of severe osteoporotic fractures.
老年人群中踝关节脆性骨折的发病率呈上升趋势。由于骨质疏松导致骨量质量下降,这些骨折的切开复位内固定具有挑战性。生物力学研究表明,在腓骨骨折固定中使用增强结构的结果相互矛盾。因此,我们对远端腓骨骨折增强固定的生物力学研究进行了荟萃分析。
利用三个在线数据库进行文献检索,考虑远端腓骨骨折不同固定技术的生物力学测试。对两个生物力学结果指标进行荟萃分析;扭转刚度和破坏扭矩。
在总共13项研究中,确定了8种不同的增强技术。在这些研究中,有6项将锁定外侧钢板与传统外侧钢板进行了比较。锁定钢板和非锁定钢板在破坏扭矩或扭转刚度方面没有统计学上的显著差异。在四项研究中,锁定钢板的强度与骨密度无关。在一项研究中,防滑钢板在生物力学上被证明优于外侧钢板,在另一项研究中优于锁定钢板。
锁定外侧钢板在生物力学上并不优于传统外侧钢板。然而,锁定钢板的强度可能与骨密度无关,这可能使该技术更适合于严重骨质疏松性骨折的固定。