Rio David, Woog Kelly, Legras Richard
Laboratoire Aimé Cotton, CNRS, ENS Cachan, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Jul;36(4):411-20. doi: 10.1111/opo.12300. Epub 2016 May 15.
We investigated the impact of lens centration, wearer aberrations, pupil size and age on the optics of two bifocal contact lenses using image simulation.
Fourteen conditions (i.e. two optical profiles with two and eight concentric zones; two conditions of centration: centred and 0.77 mm decentred; and three conditions of aberrations: 0, 0.15 and 0.35 μm RMS; three pupil sizes: 3, 4.5 and 6 mm) were tested on two populations (i.e. 20-40 and 40-60 years old) using a numerical simulation method. For each condition, images were calculated for proximities ranging from -4D to + 2D with steps of 0.25D. Subjects graded the quality of each simulated image (i.e. a target 'HEV' of 0.4 logMAR) on a continuous scale from 0 to 5. To limit the effect of the observer's own aberrations, subjects viewed the displayed images through a 3-mm pupil and their optimal correction.
Both populations reported similar image quality (i.e. average absolute difference of 0.23) except for sharp and low contrast images, which obtained slightly higher grades with younger subjects, probably due to a better contrast sensitivity in this population. Typical decentration had no effect on bifocal contact lenses wearers' vision, as the ratio between areas dedicated to near and distance vision did not change. Aberrations (i.e. mainly 0.24 μm of spherical aberration on a 4.5-mm pupil) reduced the addition of the two radial zones bifocal optics and introduced a hyperopic shift (i.e. 0.50D) of the through-focus image quality for the eight radial zone bifocal lens. The combination of typical aberrations with typical decentration created the same effect as typical aberrations alone, meaning that aberration impact was stronger than decentration impact. The two radial zone bifocal lens was dependent on the pupil whereas the eight radial zone lens was not.
When fitting new bifocal optics, the aberrations of the patients, as well as their pupil diameter, are the main subject dependent parameters influencing quality of vision. Typical contact lens decentration and lower cortical treatment efficiency of retinal images of older subjects had relatively little impact.
我们使用图像模拟研究了镜片中心定位、佩戴者像差、瞳孔大小和年龄对两种双焦点隐形眼镜光学性能的影响。
采用数值模拟方法,在两个人群(即20 - 40岁和40 - 60岁)中测试了14种情况(即两种具有两个和八个同心区域的光学轮廓;两种中心定位情况:居中及偏心0.77 mm;三种像差情况:均方根值分别为0、0.15和0.35μm;三种瞳孔大小:3、4.5和6 mm)。对于每种情况,计算了从 - 4D到 + 2D、步长为0.25D的不同近距离下的图像。受试者对每个模拟图像的质量(即目标“HEV”为0.4 logMAR)在0到5的连续尺度上进行评分。为了限制观察者自身像差的影响,受试者通过3 mm的瞳孔及其最佳矫正来观察显示的图像。
除了清晰和低对比度图像外,两个人群报告的图像质量相似(即平均绝对差异为0.23),清晰和低对比度图像在年轻受试者中获得的评分略高,这可能是由于该人群具有更好的对比度敏感度。典型的偏心对双焦点隐形眼镜佩戴者的视力没有影响,因为用于近视力和远视力区域的比例没有变化。像差(即在4.5 mm瞳孔上主要为0.24μm的球差)降低了两个径向区域双焦点光学系统的附加度数,并为八个径向区域双焦点镜片引入了聚焦图像质量的远视偏移(即0.50D)。典型像差与典型偏心的组合产生的效果与单独的典型像差相同,这意味着像差的影响比偏心的影响更强。两个径向区域双焦点镜片依赖于瞳孔,而八个径向区域镜片则不依赖。
在适配新的双焦点光学系统时,患者的像差以及瞳孔直径是影响视觉质量的主要个体相关参数。典型的隐形眼镜偏心和老年受试者视网膜图像较低的皮质处理效率影响相对较小。