Larson Kajal B, Cressey Tim R, Yogev Ram, Wiznia Andrew, Hazra Rohan, Jean-Philippe Patrick, Graham Bobbie, Gonzalez Amy, Britto Paula, Carey Vincent J, Acosta Edward P
University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2016 Jun;5(2):131-7. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu142. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
Limited data are available for once-daily (QD) darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir (r) in the pediatric population. Coadministration of etravirine (ETR) may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRV. We evaluated the PK interactions between DRV/r (QD) and ETR QD or twice-daily (BID) in children, adolescents, and young adults.
Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects 9 to < 24 years old on optimized background therapy including DRV/r 800/100 mg QD alone or combined with ETR 200 mg BID or ETR 400 mg QD were enrolled. Protocol-defined target drug exposure ranges based on adult data were used to assess the adequacy of each regimen. Intensive 24-hour blood sampling was performed, and PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis.
Thirty-one subjects (14 males) completed the study; 16 received DRV/r QD alone (group 1), 6 received DRV/r plus ETR BID (group 2A), and 9 received DRV/r plus ETR QD (group 2B). The geometric mean (90% confidence interval [CI] geometric mean) for DRV area under the curve at 24 hours (AUC24) was 57.9 (49.6-67.6), 74.9 (44.4-126.5), and 66.4 (50.8-86.9) mg × h/L for patients in groups 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. The increased DRV exposure when coadministered with ETR was not statistically significant. The geometric mean (90% CI geometric mean) of ETR AUC24 was 8.6 (4.4-16.8) and 11.9 (7.5-18.9) mg × h/L for groups 2A and 2B, respectively, with comparable C24.
The results suggest that DRV/r QD with ETR 400 mg QD or 200 mg BID is appropriate and support further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the once-daily regimen in older children, adolescents, and young adults.
关于儿科人群每日一次(QD)服用达芦那韦(DRV)/利托那韦(r)的数据有限。依曲韦林(ETR)的联合使用可能会改变DRV的药代动力学(PK)。我们评估了儿童、青少年和年轻成人中DRV/r(QD)与ETR QD或每日两次(BID)之间的PK相互作用。
纳入年龄在9至<24岁、接受包括单独每日一次服用800/100 mg DRV/r或联合200 mg BID ETR或400 mg QD ETR的优化背景治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染受试者。基于成人数据的方案定义的目标药物暴露范围用于评估每种治疗方案的充分性。进行了密集的24小时血样采集,并使用非房室分析确定PK参数。
31名受试者(14名男性)完成了研究;16名单独接受DRV/r QD(第1组),6名接受DRV/r加ETR BID(第2A组),9名接受DRV/r加ETR QD(第2B组)。第1组、第2A组和第2B组患者在24小时时DRV曲线下面积(AUC24)的几何均值(90%置信区间[CI]几何均值)分别为57.9(49.6 - 67.6)、74.9(44.4 - 126.5)和66.4(50.8 - 86.9)mg×h/L。与ETR联合使用时DRV暴露的增加无统计学意义。第2A组和第2B组ETR AUC24的几何均值(90% CI几何均值)分别为8.6(4.4 - 16.8)和11.9(7.5 - 18.9)mg×h/L,C24相当。
结果表明,DRV/r QD联合400 mg QD或200 mg BID ETR是合适的,并支持进一步评估该每日一次治疗方案在大龄儿童、青少年和年轻成人中的安全性和有效性。