Suppr超能文献

基于社区的专科姑息治疗的高接触模式:潜在类别分析识别出不同的患者亚组。

A High-Touch Model of Community-Based Specialist Palliative Care: Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Patient Subgroups.

作者信息

Dhingra Lara, Dieckmann Nathan F, Knotkova Helena, Chen Jack, Riggs Alexa, Breuer Brenda, Hiney Barbara, Lee Bernard, McCarthy Maureen, Portenoy Russell

机构信息

MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, New York, USA.

School of Nursing and School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Decision Research, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Aug;52(2):178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 18.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Community-based palliative care may support seriously ill homebound patients. Programs vary widely, and few studies have described the heterogeneity of the populations served or service delivery models.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a diverse population served by an interdisciplinary model of community-based specialist palliative care and the variation in service delivery over time and identify subgroups with distinct illness burden profiles.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluated longitudinal electronic health record data from 894 patients served during 2010-2013. Illness burden was defined by measures of performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status scale), symptom distress (Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), palliative care needs (Palliative Outcome Scale), and quality of life (Spitzer Quality of Life Index). Service utilization included the frequency of visits received and calls made or received by patients. Latent class analysis identified patient subgroups with distinct illness burden profiles, and mixed-effects modeling was used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and service utilization.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.3 years (SD = 14.0); 56.2% were women; 67.5% were English speaking; and 22.2% were Spanish speaking. Most had congestive heart failure (36.4%) or cancer (30.4%); 98.0% had a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 40-70. Four patient subgroups were identified: very low illness burden (26.2%); low burden (39.5%); moderate burden (13.5%); and high burden (20.8%). The subgroups differed in both baseline characteristics and palliative care service utilization over time.

CONCLUSION

The population served by a community-based specialist palliative care program manages patients with different levels of illness burden, which are associated with patient characteristics and service utilization.

摘要

背景

基于社区的姑息治疗可能有助于居家的重症患者。相关项目差异很大,很少有研究描述所服务人群的异质性或服务提供模式。

目的

评估由基于社区的专科姑息治疗跨学科模式服务的多样化人群以及服务提供随时间的变化情况,并识别具有不同疾病负担特征的亚组。

方法

一项回顾性队列研究评估了2010年至2013年期间894名患者的纵向电子健康记录数据。疾病负担通过功能状态(卡氏功能状态量表)、症状困扰(简明纪念症状评估量表)、姑息治疗需求(姑息治疗结果量表)和生活质量(斯皮策生活质量指数)来衡量。服务利用包括患者接受访视的频率以及患者拨打或接听电话的情况。潜在类别分析识别出具有不同疾病负担特征的患者亚组,并使用混合效应模型评估患者特征与服务利用之间的关联。

结果

平均年龄为72.3岁(标准差=14.0);56.2%为女性;67.5%讲英语;22.2%讲西班牙语。大多数人患有充血性心力衰竭(36.4%)或癌症(30.4%);98.0%的卡氏功能状态评分为40 - 70分。识别出四个患者亚组:极低疾病负担(26.2%);低负担(39.5%);中等负担(13.5%);和高负担(20.8%)。这些亚组在基线特征和随时间的姑息治疗服务利用方面均存在差异。

结论

基于社区的专科姑息治疗项目所服务的人群管理着不同疾病负担水平的患者,这些疾病负担与患者特征和服务利用相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验