Lee Hyuk Je, Heim Valentin, Meyer Axel
Chair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology Department of Biology University of Konstanz 78457 Konstanz Germany; Department of Biological Science College of Science and Engineering Sangji University Wonju 220-702 Korea.
Chair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology Department of Biology University of Konstanz 78457 Konstanz Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 21;6(9):2843-53. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089. eCollection 2016 May.
Alloparental care - care for unrelated young - is rare in animals, and its ecological or evolutionary advantages or, alternative maladaptive nature, remain unclear. We investigate alloparental care in the socially monogamous cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis from Lake Tanganyika that exhibits bi-parental care. In a genetic parentage analysis, we discovered a surprisingly high percentage of alloparental care represented by brood mixing, extra-pair paternity and extra-pair maternity in all broods that we investigated. The percentage of nondescendant juveniles of other parents, i.e., brood mixing, ranged from 5% to 57% (mean = 28%). The distribution of genetic parentage also suggests that this socially monogamous species has, in fact, polygamous mating system. The prevalence of genetically mixed broods can be best explained by two, not mutually exclusive hypotheses on farming-out and fostering behaviors. In the majority of broods, the sizes of the parents' own (descendant) offspring were significantly larger than those of the adopted (nondescendant) juveniles, supporting the 'selfish shepherd effect' hypothesis, i.e., that foster parents preferentially accept unrelated "smaller or not larger" young since this would tend to lower the predation risks for their own larger offspring. There was also a tendency for larger parents particularly mothers, more so than smaller parents, to care predominantly for their own offspring. Larger parents might be better at defending against cuckoldry and having foreign young dumped into their broods through farming-out behavior. This result might argue for maladaptive effects of allopatric care for the foster parents that only larger and possibly more experienced pairs can guard against. It needs to be determined why, apparently, the ability to recognize one's own young has not evolved in this species.
异亲照料——对非亲生子嗣的照料——在动物中很罕见,其生态或进化优势,或者相反的适应不良特性,仍不明确。我们研究了来自坦噶尼喀湖的实行社会单配制的丽鱼科鱼类小鳞佩丽鲷的异亲照料行为,该物种表现出双亲照料行为。在一项基因亲权分析中,我们发现在我们调查的所有鱼群中,由鱼群混合、异亲父权和异亲母权所代表的异亲照料比例高得出奇。其他亲本的非后代幼鱼的比例,即鱼群混合,范围在5%至57%之间(平均为28%)。基因亲权的分布也表明,这种社会单配制物种实际上具有多配制的交配系统。基因混合鱼群的普遍存在,最好用关于寄养和抚育行为的两种并非相互排斥的假说来解释。在大多数鱼群中,亲本自己(后代)的幼鱼尺寸明显大于被收养(非后代)的幼鱼,这支持了“自私牧羊人效应”假说,即养父母优先接受无亲缘关系的“更小或不更大”的幼鱼,因为这往往会降低其自身较大后代的被捕食风险。体型较大的亲本,尤其是母亲,相比于体型较小的亲本,也更倾向于主要照料自己的后代。体型较大的亲本可能更善于抵御戴绿帽现象,以及防范通过寄养行为将外来幼鱼放入其鱼群的情况。这一结果可能表明异亲照料对养父母具有适应不良的影响,只有体型较大且可能更有经验的亲本对才能防范这种影响。需要确定为什么显然这个物种没有进化出识别自己幼鱼的能力。