Kim Young Soo, Yun In Sik, Chung Seum
From the *Bona Microtia and Aesthetic Ear Surgery Clinic; †Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul; and ‡Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, South Korea.
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;78(2):178-183. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000839.
One of the most common complications of total auricular reconstruction is delayed wound healing, which results in skin necrosis and exposure of the ear framework. Various options exist for salvage of the exposed ear framework.
From January 2009 to May 2014, 149 patients underwent total auricular reconstruction using an autogenous cartilage framework or porous polyethylene framework (Medpor; Stryker, USA). An autogenous cartilage framework was used in 48 patients, and a Medpor framework was used in 101 cases. Three cases of framework exposure (3/48, 6.3%) were observed among the patients treated with an autogenous cartilage framework. In contrast, framework exposure took place in 11 patients who were treated with a Medpor framework (11/101, 10.9%). Depending on the method of total ear reconstruction and the location of exposure, the authors used local skin flaps, temporoparietal fascia flaps, deep temporal fascia (DTF) flaps, or mastoid fascia (MF) flaps with skin grafting.
Among the 11 patients who experienced framework exposure after being treated with a Medpor framework, a DTF flap with skin grafting was used in 6 patients and an MF flap with skin grafting in 6 patients; 1 patient was treated with both a DTF flap and an MF flap. All 3 cases of cartilage framework exposure were salvaged using a temporoparietal fascia flap with skin grafting, and a local skin flap was used in 1 case. In all 3 cases, the exposed framework was completely covered with the flap, and the reconstructed ears showed well-defined convolutions.
Salvage of framework exposure remains a challenging issue in total auricular reconstruction. However, appropriate wound management using various flaps allows the reconstructed ear to be safely preserved.
全耳再造最常见的并发症之一是伤口愈合延迟,这会导致皮肤坏死和耳支架外露。对于外露的耳支架有多种挽救方法。
2009年1月至2014年5月,149例患者采用自体软骨支架或多孔聚乙烯支架(Medpor;美国史赛克公司)进行全耳再造。48例患者使用自体软骨支架,101例使用Medpor支架。在接受自体软骨支架治疗的患者中观察到3例支架外露(3/48,6.3%)。相比之下,使用Medpor支架治疗的患者中有11例出现支架外露(11/101,10.9%)。根据全耳再造方法和外露部位,作者采用局部皮瓣、颞顶筋膜瓣、颞深筋膜(DTF)瓣或带植皮的乳突筋膜(MF)瓣。
在使用Medpor支架治疗后出现支架外露的11例患者中,6例使用带植皮的DTF瓣,6例使用带植皮的MF瓣;1例患者同时接受了DTF瓣和MF瓣治疗。所有3例软骨支架外露均采用带植皮的颞顶筋膜瓣挽救,1例使用局部皮瓣。在所有3例中,外露的支架均被皮瓣完全覆盖,再造耳呈现出清晰的卷曲形态。
在全耳再造中,挽救支架外露仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。然而,使用各种皮瓣进行适当的伤口处理可使再造耳得以安全保留。